Probabilistic Inference in Reinforcement Learning Done Right
Jean Tarbouriech, Tor Lattimore, Brendan O'Donoghue
Abstract
A popular perspective in Reinforcement learning (RL) casts the problem as probabilistic inference on a graphical model of the Markov decision process (MDP). The core object of study is the probability of each state-action pair being visited under the optimal policy. Previous approaches to approximate this quantity can be arbitrarily poor, leading to algorithms that do not implement genuine statistical inference and consequently do not perform well in challenging problems. In this work, we undertake a rigorous Bayesian treatment of the posterior probability of state-action optimality and clarify how it flows through the MDP. We first reveal that this quantity can indeed be used to generate a policy that explores efficiently, as measured by regret. Unfortunately, computing it is intractable, so we derive a new variational Bayesian approximation yielding a tractable convex optimization problem and establish that the resulting policy also explores efficiently. We call our approach VAPOR and show that it has strong connections to Thompson sampling, Klearning, and maximum entropy exploration. We conclude with some experiments demonstrating the performance advantage of a deep RL version of VAPOR. 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2023).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 55f44a68-e3d7-48fb-9b5a-6e8adedbb735Cited by top-tier papers8
- Confronting Reward Model Overoptimization with Constrained RLHFTed Moskovitz, Aaditya K. Singh, DJ Strouse, Tuomas Sandholm et al.ICLR 2024 · 89 citations
- Maximum Likelihood Reinforcement LearningFahim Tajwar, Guanning Zeng, Yueer Zhou, Yuda Song et al.ICML 2026 · 18 citations
- Toward Efficient Exploration by Large Language Model AgentsDilip Arumugam, Thomas L. GriffithsICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Thompson Sampling via Fine-Tuning of LLMsNicolas Menet, Aleksandar Terzic, Michael Hersche, Andreas Krause et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Convergence Theorems for Entropy-Regularized and Distributional Reinforcement LearningYash Jhaveri, Harley Wiltzer, Patrick Shafto, Marc G. Bellemare et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
Builds on13
- Behaviour Suite for Reinforcement LearningIan Osband, Yotam Doron, Matteo Hessel, John Aslanides et al.ICLR 2020 · 204 citations
- Almost Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learningvia Reference-Advantage DecompositionZihan Zhang, Yuan Zhou, Xiangyang JiNeurIPS 2020 · 183 citations
- Reward is enough for convex MDPsTom Zahavy, Brendan O'Donoghue, Guillaume Desjardins, Satinder SinghNeurIPS 2021 · 96 citations
- Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement LearningGen Li, Laixi Shi, Yuxin Chen, Yuantao Gu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 71 citations
- Task-Agnostic Exploration via Policy Gradient of a Non-Parametric State Entropy EstimateMirco Mutti, Lorenzo Pratissoli, Marcello RestelliAAAI 2021 · 62 citations
Related papers
- VariBAD: A Very Good Method for Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-LearningLuisa M. Zintgraf, Kyriacos Shiarlis, Maximilian Igl, Sebastian Schulze et al.ICLR 2020 · 315 citations
- Planning to the Information Horizon of BAMDPs via Epistemic State AbstractionDilip Arumugam, Satinder SinghNeurIPS 2022 · 7 citations
- Provable and Practical: Efficient Exploration in Reinforcement Learning via Langevin Monte CarloHaque Ishfaq, Qingfeng Lan, Pan Xu, A. Rupam Mahmood et al.ICLR 2024 · 33 citations
- Bayesian Exploration NetworksMattie Fellows, Brandon Kaplowitz, Christian Schröder de Witt, Shimon WhitesonICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Making Sense of Reinforcement Learning and Probabilistic InferenceBrendan O'Donoghue, Ian Osband, Catalin IonescuICLR 2020 · 54 citations
