Characterizing Stage-aware Writing Assistance for Collaborative Document Authoring
Bahareh Sarrafzadeh, Sujay Kumar Jauhar, Michael Gamon, Edward Lank, Ryen W. White
Abstract
Writing is a complex non-linear process that begins with a mental model of intent, and progresses through an outline of ideas, to words on paper (and their subsequent refinement). Despite past research in understanding writing, Web-scale consumer and enterprise collaborative digital writing environments are yet to greatly benefit from intelligent systems that understand the stages of document evolution, providing opportune assistance based on authors' situated actions and context. In this paper, we present three studies that explore temporal stages of document authoring. We first survey information workers at a large technology company about their writing habits and preferences, concluding that writers do in fact conceptually progress through several distinct phases while authoring documents. We also explore, qualitatively, how writing stages are linked to document lifespan. We supplement these qualitative findings with an analysis of the longitudinal user interaction logs of a popular digital writing platform over several million documents. Finally, as a first step towards facilitating an intelligent digital writing assistant, we conduct a preliminary investigation into the utility of user interaction log data for predicting the temporal stage of a document. Our results support the benefit of tools tailored to writing stages, identify primary tasks associated with these stages, and show that it is possible to predict stages from anonymous interaction logs. Together, these results argue for the benefit and feasibility of more tailored digital writing assistance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 93c77d43-765e-4d9d-83a5-cf255ab9d563Cited by top-tier papers6
- Co-Writing with AI, on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing ProcessMohi Reza, Jeb Thomas-Mitchell, Peter Dushniku, Nathan Laundry et al.CSCW 2025 · 29 citations
- Beyond the Chat: Executable and Verifiable Text-Editing with LLMsPhilippe Laban, Jesse Vig, Marti A. Hearst, Caiming Xiong et al.UIST 2024 · 29 citations
- The Invisible Labor of Access in Academic Writing Practices: A Case Analysis with Dyslexic AdultsEmily Q. Wang, Anne Marie PiperCSCW 2022 · 22 citations
- Why "why"? The Importance of Communicating Rationales for Edits in Collaborative WritingSo Yeon Park, Sang Won LeeCHI 2023 · 5 citations
- Prototypical Human-AI Collaboration Behaviors from LLM-Assisted Writing in the WildSheshera Mysore, Debarati Das, Hancheng Cao, Bahareh SarrafzadehEMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
Related papers
- CrossData: Leveraging Text-Data Connections for Authoring Data DocumentsChen Zhu-Tian, Haijun XiaCHI 2022 · 41 citations
- Understanding Questions that Arise When Working with Business DocumentsFarnaz Jahanbakhsh, Elnaz Nouri, Robert Sim, Ryen W. White et al.CSCW 2022 · 11 citations
- A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing AssistantsMina Lee, Katy Ilonka Gero, John Joon Young Chung, Simon Buckingham Shum et al.CHI 2024 · 133 citations
- ScholaWrite: A Dataset of End-to-End Scholarly WritingKhanh Chi Le, Linghe Wang, Minhwa Lee, Ross Volkov et al.ACL 2026
- Shaping Human-AI Collaboration: Varied Scaffolding Levels in Co-writing with Language ModelsParamveer S. Dhillon, Somayeh Molaei, Jiaqi Li, Maximilian Golub et al.CHI 2024 · 102 citations
