Beyond the Chat: Executable and Verifiable Text-Editing with LLMs
Philippe Laban, Jesse Vig, Marti A. Hearst, Caiming Xiong, Chien-Sheng Wu
Abstract
Conversational interfaces powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently become a popular way to obtain feedback during document editing. However, standard chat-based conversational interfaces cannot explicitly surface the editing changes that they suggest. To give the author more control when editing with an LLM, we present InkSync, an editing interface that suggests executable edits directly within the document being edited. Because LLMs are known to introduce factual errors, Inksync also supports a 3-stage approach to mitigate this risk: Warn authors when a suggested edit introduces new information, help authors Verify the new information’s accuracy through external search, and allow a third party to Audit with a-posteriori verification via a trace of all auto-generated content. Two usability studies confirm the effectiveness of InkSync’s components when compared to standard LLM-based chat interfaces, leading to more accurate and more efficient editing, and improved user experience.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f4e0360f-90b4-4692-a0e7-28bd4c45586dCited by top-tier papers22
- How Do Analysts Understand and Verify AI-Assisted Data Analyses?Ken Gu, Ruoxi Shang, Tim Althoff, Chenglong Wang et al.CHI 2024 · 36 citations
- Co-Writing with AI, on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing ProcessMohi Reza, Jeb Thomas-Mitchell, Peter Dushniku, Nathan Laundry et al.CSCW 2025 · 29 citations
- Generative AI and Perceptual Harms: Who's Suspected of using LLMs?Kowe Kadoma, Danaë Metaxa, Mor NaamanCHI 2025 · 28 citations
- VideoDiff: Human-AI Video Co-Creation with AlternativesMina Huh, Ding Li, Kim Pimmel, Hijung Valentina Shin et al.CHI 2025 · 26 citations
- Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Benchmarking AI Text Detection in Peer ReviewSungduk Yu, Man Luo, Avinash Madasu, Vasudev Lal et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
Builds on21
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model CapabilitiesMina Lee, Percy Liang, Qian YangCHI 2022 · 340 citations
- Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: Evaluation by Industry ProfessionalsPiotr Mirowski, Kory W. Mathewson, Jaylen Pittman, Richard EvansCHI 2023 · 235 citations
Related papers
- ABScribe: Rapid Exploration & Organization of Multiple Writing Variations in Human-AI Co-Writing Tasks using Large Language ModelsMohi Reza, Nathan M. Laundry, Ilya Musabirov, Peter Dushniku et al.CHI 2024 · 52 citations
- PaperTrail: A Claim-Evidence Interface for Grounding Provenance in LLM-based Scholarly Q&AAnna Martin-Boyle, Cara A. C. Leckey, Martha Brown, Harmanpreet KaurCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- LLM-box vs. Thinking-box: Designing for Deliberate User Engagement with Distorted Information in Conversational SearchSohyun Park, Tak Yeon Lee, Woohun LeeCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Can You Make It Sound Like You? Post-Editing LLM-Generated Text for Personal StyleConnor Baumler, Calvin Bao, Huy Nghiem, Xinchen Yang et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Effects of LLM-based Search on Decision Making: Speed, Accuracy, and OverrelianceSofia Eleni Spatharioti, David M. Rothschild, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. HofmanCHI 2025 · 28 citations
