Subjective Probability Correction for Uncertainty Representations
Fumeng Yang, Maryam Hedayati, Matthew Kay
Abstract
We propose a new approach to uncertainty communication: we keep the uncertainty representation fixed, but adjust the distribution displayed to compensate for biases in people’s subjective probability in decision-making. To do so, we adopt a linear-in-probit model of subjective probability and derive two corrections to a Normal distribution based on the model’s intercept and slope: one correcting all right-tailed probabilities, and the other preserving the mode and one focal probability. We then conduct two experiments on U.S. demographically-representative samples. We show participants hypothetical U.S. Senate election forecasts as text or a histogram and elicit their subjective probabilities using a betting task. The first experiment estimates the linear-in-probit intercepts and slopes, and confirms the biases in participants’ subjective probabilities. The second, preregistered follow-up shows participants the bias-corrected forecast distributions. We find the corrections substantially improve participants’ decision quality by reducing the integrated absolute error of their subjective probabilities compared to the true probabilities. These corrections can be generalized to any univariate probability or confidence distribution, giving them broad applicability. Our preprint, code, data, and preregistration are available at https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/kcwxm
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 93c3ecce-8f33-4491-8fd7-3dec919a3febCited by top-tier papers7
- Swaying the Public? Impacts of Election Forecast Visualizations on Emotion, Trust, and Intention in the 2022 U.S. MidtermsFumeng Yang, Mandi Cai, Chloe Mortenson, Hoda Fakhari et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 30 citations
- (Beyond) Reasonable Doubt: Challenges that Public Defenders Face in Scrutinizing AI in CourtAngela Jin, Niloufar SalehiCHI 2024 · 10 citations
- More Forecasts, More (Decision) Problems: How Uncertainty Representations for Multiple Forecasts Impact Decision MakingAbhraneel Sarma, Maryam Hedayati, Matthew KayCHI 2025 · 9 citations
- Unmasking Dunning-Kruger Effect in Visual Reasoning & JudgmentMengyu Chen, Yijun Liu, Emily WallIEEE VIS 2024 · 6 citations
- The Backstory to "Swaying the Public": A Design Chronicle of Election Forecast VisualizationsFumeng Yang, Mandi Cai, Chloe Mortenson, Hoda Fakhari et al.IEEE VIS 2024 · 5 citations
Builds on3
- Visual Reasoning Strategies for Effect Size Judgments and DecisionsAlex Kale, Matthew Kay, Jessica HullmanIEEE VIS 2020 · 112 citations
- Modeling Just Noticeable Differences in ChartsMin Lu, Joel Lanir, Chufeng Wang, Yucong Yao et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 25 citations
- Data-Driven Mark Orientation for Trend Estimation in ScatterplotsTingting Liu, Xiaotong Li, Chen Bao, Michael Correll et al.CHI 2021 · 17 citations
Related papers
- In Dice We Trust: Uncertainty Displays for Maintaining Trust in Election Forecasts Over TimeFumeng Yang, Chloe Rose Mortenson, Erik C. Nisbet, Nicholas Diakopoulos et al.CHI 2024 · 10 citations
- Bayesian-Assisted Inference from Visualized DataYea-Seul Kim, Paula Kayongo, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Jessica HullmanIEEE VIS 2020 · 40 citations
- Using AI Uncertainty Quantification to Improve Human Decision-MakingLaura Marusich, Jonathan Z. Bakdash, Yan Zhou, Murat KantarciogluICML 2024 · 16 citations
- A Bayesian cognition approach for belief updating of correlation judgement through uncertainty visualizationsAlireza Karduni, Douglas Markant, Ryan Wesslen, Wenwen DouIEEE VIS 2020 · 34 citations
- Evaluating Theory of (an uncertain) Mind: Predicting the Uncertain Beliefs of Others from Conversational CuesAnthony B. Sicilia, Malihe AlikhaniACL 2025 · 2 citations
