Using AI Uncertainty Quantification to Improve Human Decision-Making
Laura Marusich, Jonathan Z. Bakdash, Yan Zhou, Murat Kantarcioglu
Abstract
AI Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) has the potential to improve human decision-making beyond AI predictions alone by providing additional probabilistic information to users. The majority of past research on AI and human decision-making has concentrated on model explainability and interpretability, with little focus on understanding the potential impact of UQ on human decision-making. We evaluated the impact on human decision-making for instance-level UQ, calibrated using a strict scoring rule, in two online behavioral experiments. In the first experiment, our results showed that UQ was beneficial for decision-making performance compared to only AI predictions. In the second experiment, we found UQ had generalizable benefits for decision-making across a variety of representations for probabilistic information. These results indicate that implementing high quality, instance-level UQ for AI may improve decision-making with real systems compared to AI predictions alone.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext df409b83-b3a3-48d2-b3d4-44c25b947231Cited by top-tier papers2
- Online Algorithms with Uncertainty-Quantified PredictionsBo Sun, Jerry Huang, Nicolas Christianson, Mohammad Hajiesmaili et al.ICML 2024 · 12 citations
- Human-AI Collaborative Uncertainty QuantificationSima Noorani, Shayan Kiyani, George Pappas, Hamed HassaniICML 2026 · 8 citations
Builds on8
- To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingZana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. GajosCSCW 2021 · 962 citations
- Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of GeneralizationAndrew Gordon Wilson, Pavel IzmailovNeurIPS 2020 · 845 citations
- From Variational to Deterministic AutoencodersPartha Ghosh, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Antonio Vergari, Michael J. Black et al.ICLR 2020 · 298 citations
- Does Explainable Artificial Intelligence Improve Human Decision-Making?Yasmeen Alufaisan, Laura R. Marusich, Jonathan Z. Bakdash, Yan Zhou et al.AAAI 2021 · 135 citations
- Universal Adversarial Perturbation via Prior Driven Uncertainty ApproximationHong Liu, Rongrong Ji, Jie Li, Baochang Zhang et al.ICCV 2019 · 90 citations
Related papers
- Uncalibrated Models Can Improve Human-AI CollaborationKailas Vodrahalli, Tobias Gerstenberg, James Y. ZouNeurIPS 2022 · 47 citations
- Learning to Explain Selectively: A Case Study on Question AnsweringShi Feng, Jordan L. Boyd-GraberEMNLP 2022 · 4 citations
- What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability MethodsJulien Colin, Thomas Fel, Rémi Cadène, Thomas SerreNeurIPS 2022 · 147 citations
- Conformal Prediction Sets Improve Human Decision MakingJesse C. Cresswell, Yi Sui, Bhargava Kumar, Noël VouitsisICML 2024 · 36 citations
- "Are You Really Sure?" Understanding the Effects of Human Self-Confidence Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision MakingShuai Ma, Xinru Wang, Ying Lei, Chuhan Shi et al.CHI 2024 · 54 citations
