Subgame Solving in Adversarial Team Games
Brian Hu Zhang, Luca Carminati, Federico Cacciamani, Gabriele Farina, Pierriccardo Olivieri, Nicola Gatti, Tuomas Sandholm
Abstract
In adversarial team games, a team of players sequentially faces a team of adversaries. These games are the simplest setting with multiple players where cooperation and competition coexist, and it is known that the information asymmetry among the team members makes equilibrium approximation computationally hard. Although much effort has been spent designing scalable algorithms, the problem of solving large game instances is open. In this paper, we extend the successful approach of solving huge two-player zero-sum games, where a blueprint strategy is computed offline by using an abstract version of the game and then it is refined online, that is, during a playthrough. In particular, to the best of our knowledge, our paper provides the first method for online strategy refinement via subgame solving in adversarial team games. Our method, based on the team belief DAG, generates a gadget game and then refine the blueprint strategy by using column-generation approaches in anytime fashion. If the blueprint is sparse, then our whole algorithm runs end-to-end in polynomial time given a best-response oracle; in particular, it avoids expanding the whole team belief DAG, which has exponential worst-case size. We apply our method to a standard test suite, and we empirically show the performance improvement of the strategies thanks to subgame solving. * equal contribution; author order randomized 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 92b8c1be-3fd2-4b9f-bffb-4a4ab4c4839cCited by top-tier papers5
- Abstracting Imperfect Information Away from Two-Player Zero-Sum GamesSamuel Sokota, Ryan D'Orazio, Chun Kai Ling, David J. Wu et al.ICML 2023 · 8 citations
- DAG-Based Column Generation for Adversarial Team GamesYouzhi Zhang, Bo An, Daniel Dajun ZengICML 2024 · 6 citations
- Team-Fictitious Play for Reaching Team-Nash Equilibrium in Multi-team GamesAhmed Said Donmez, Yuksel Arslantas, Muhammed Omer SayinNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- Solving Imperfect-Recall Games via Sum-of-Squares OptimizationRui Zheng, Ryann Sim, Antonios VarvitsiotisICML 2026
- The Complexity of Two-Team Polymatrix Games with Independent AdversariesAlexandros Hollender, Gilbert Maystre, Sai Ganesh NagarajanICLR 2025
Builds on3
- Computing Ex Ante Coordinated Team-Maxmin Equilibria in Zero-Sum Multiplayer Extensive-Form GamesYouzhi Zhang, Bo An, Jakub CernýAAAI 2021 · 30 citations
- Connecting Optimal Ex-Ante Collusion in Teams to Extensive-Form Correlation: Faster Algorithms and Positive Complexity ResultsGabriele Farina, Andrea Celli, Nicola Gatti, Tuomas SandholmICML 2021 · 29 citations
- Team Correlated Equilibria in Zero-Sum Extensive-Form Games via Tree DecompositionsBrian Hu Zhang, Tuomas SandholmAAAI 2022 · 26 citations
Related papers
- A Marriage between Adversarial Team Games and 2-player Games: Enabling Abstractions, No-regret Learning, and Subgame SolvingLuca Carminati, Federico Cacciamani, Marco Ciccone, Nicola GattiICML 2022 · 18 citations
- Team Belief DAG: Generalizing the Sequence Form to Team Games for Fast Computation of Correlated Team Max-Min Equilibria via Regret MinimizationBrian Hu Zhang, Gabriele Farina, Tuomas SandholmICML 2023 · 16 citations
- Safe Search for Stackelberg Equilibria in Extensive-Form GamesChun Kai Ling, Noam BrownAAAI 2021 · 3 citations
- Efficient Subgame Refinement for Extensive-form GamesZhenxing Ge, Zheng Xu, Tianyu Ding, Wenbin Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 2 citations
- Converging to Team-Maxmin Equilibria in Zero-Sum Multiplayer GamesYouzhi Zhang, Bo AnICML 2020 · 22 citations
