Importance-driven deep learning system testing
Simos Gerasimou, Hasan Ferit Eniser, Alper Sen, Alper Çakan
Abstract
Deep Learning (DL) systems are key enablers for engineering intelligent applications due to their ability to solve complex tasks such as image recognition and machine translation. Nevertheless, using DL systems in safety- and security-critical applications requires to provide testing evidence for their dependable operation. Recent research in this direction focuses on adapting testing criteria from traditional software engineering as a means of increasing confidence for their correct behaviour. However, they are inadequate in capturing the intrinsic properties exhibited by these systems. We bridge this gap by introducing DeepImportance, a systematic testing methodology accompanied by an Importance-Driven (IDC) test adequacy criterion for DL systems. Applying IDC enables to establish a layer-wise functional understanding of the importance of DL system components and use this information to assess the semantic diversity of a test set. Our empirical evaluation on several DL systems, across multiple DL datasets and with state-of-the-art adversarial generation techniques demonstrates the usefulness and effectiveness of DeepImportance and its ability to support the engineering of more robust DL systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 92269378-51ec-4742-bfe0-d5b49819ee18Cited by top-tier papers17
- Problems and Opportunities in Training Deep Learning Software Systems: An Analysis of VarianceHung Viet Pham, Shangshu Qian, Jiannan Wang, Thibaud Lutellier et al.ASE 2020 · 91 citations
- Correlations between deep neural network model coverage criteria and model qualityShenao Yan, Guanhong Tao, Xuwei Liu, Juan Zhai et al.FSE 2020 · 75 citations
- AUTOTRAINER: An Automatic DNN Training Problem Detection and Repair SystemXiaoyu Zhang, Juan Zhai, Shiqing Ma, Chao ShenICSE 2021 · 62 citations
- Multiple-Boundary Clustering and Prioritization to Promote Neural Network RetrainingWeijun Shen, Yanhui Li, Lin Chen, Yuanlei Han et al.ASE 2020 · 51 citations
- Towards Training Reproducible Deep Learning ModelsBoyuan Chen, Mingzhi Wen, Yong Shi, Dayi Lin et al.ICSE 2022 · 42 citations
Builds on3
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- AI2: Safety and Robustness Certification of Neural Networks with Abstract InterpretationTimon Gehr, Matthew Mirman, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Petar Tsankov et al.S&P 2018 · 987 citations
- Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic IntervalsShiqi Wang, Kexin Pei, Justin Whitehouse, Junfeng Yang et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 523 citations
Related papers
- Test Selection for Deep Neural Networks using Meta-Models with Uncertainty MetricsDemet Demir, Aysu Betin Can, Elif SürerISSTA 2024 · 3 citations
- DeepHyperion: exploring the feature space of deep learning-based systems through illumination searchTahereh Zohdinasab, Vincenzo Riccio, Alessio Gambi, Paolo TonellaISSTA 2021 · 76 citations
- Distribution-Aware Testing of Neural Networks Using Generative ModelsSwaroopa Dola, Matthew B. Dwyer, Mary Lou SoffaICSE 2021 · 3 citations
- RobOT: Robustness-Oriented Testing for Deep Learning SystemsJingyi Wang, Jialuo Chen, Youcheng Sun, Xingjun Ma et al.ICSE 2021 · 62 citations
- LiRTest: augmenting LiDAR point clouds for automated testing of autonomous driving systemsAn Guo, Yang Feng, Zhenyu ChenISSTA 2022 · 30 citations
