Multi-expert Prompting Improves Reliability, Safety and Usefulness of Large Language Models
Do Xuan Long, Duong Ngoc Yen, Anh Tuan Luu, Kenji Kawaguchi, Min-Yen Kan, Nancy F. Chen
Abstract
We present Multi-expert Prompting, a novel enhancement of ExpertPrompting (Xu et al., 2023), designed to improve the large language model (LLM) generation. Specifically, it guides an LLM to fulfill an input instruction by simulating multiple experts, aggregating their responses, and selecting the best among individual and aggregated responses. This process is performed in a single chain of thoughts through our seven carefully designed subtasks derived from the Nominal Group Technique (Ven and Delbecq, 1974), a well-established decision-making framework. Our evaluations demonstrate that Multi-expert Prompting significantly outperforms ExpertPrompting and comparable baselines in enhancing the truthfulness, factuality, informativeness, and usefulness of responses while reducing toxicity and hurtfulness. It further achieves state-of-the-art truthfulness by outperforming the best baseline by 8.69% with ChatGPT. Multi-expert Prompting is efficient, explainable, and highly adaptable to diverse scenarios, eliminating the need for manual prompt construction.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 91c84dd4-5158-4736-87b4-d533a621bea5Cited by top-tier papers6
- Multi-Agent Collaboration via Evolving OrchestrationYufan Dang, Chen Qian, Xueheng Luo, Jingru Fan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 118 citations
- What Makes a Good Natural Language Prompt?Do Xuan Long, Duy Dinh, Ngoc-Hai Nguyen, Kenji Kawaguchi et al.ACL 2025 · 13 citations
- TriPlay-RL: Tri-Role Self-Play Reinforcement Learning for LLM Safety AlignmentZhewen Tan, Wenhan Yu, Jianfeng Si, Tongxin Liu et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- DebateCoder: Towards Collective Intelligence of LLMs via Test Case Driven LLM Debate for Code GenerationJizheng Chen, Kounianhua Du, Xinyi Dai, Weiming Zhang et al.ACL 2025
- SemVideo: Reconstructs What You Watch from Brain Activity via Hierarchical Semantic GuidanceMinghan Yang, LAN YANG, Ke Li, Honggang Zhang et al.CVPR 2026
Builds on12
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
Related papers
- Understanding the Effects of Iterative Prompting on TruthfulnessSatyapriya Krishna, Chirag Agarwal, Himabindu LakkarajuICML 2024 · 24 citations
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
- Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMsAndries P. Smit, Nathan Grinsztajn, Paul Duckworth, Thomas D. Barrett et al.ICML 2024 · 82 citations
- PRompt Optimization in Multi-Step Tasks (PROMST): Integrating Human Feedback and Heuristic-based SamplingYongchao Chen, Jacob Arkin, Yilun Hao, Yang Zhang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 6 citations
- Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models DecodingLifu Tu, Semih Yavuz, Jin Qu, Jiacheng Xu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
