Achieving Equilibrium Under Utility Heterogeneity: An Agent-Attention Framework for Multi-Agent Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning
Zhuhui Li, Chunbo Luo, Liming Huang, Luyu Qi, Geyong Min
Abstract
Multi-agent multi-objective systems (MAMOS) have emerged as powerful frameworks for modelling complex decision-making problems across various real-world domains, such as robotic exploration, autonomous traffic management, and sensor network optimisation. MAMOS enhances scalability and robustness through decentralised control and more accurately captures inherent trade-offs between conflicting objectives. In MAMOS, each agent uses utility functions that map return vectors to scalar values. Existing MAMOS optimisation methods face significant challenges in handling heterogeneous objective and utility function settings, where training non-stationarity is intensified due to private utility functions and the associated policies. In this paper, we first theoretically prove that direct access to, or structured modeling of, global utility functions is necessary to achieve the Bayesian Nash Equilibrium under decentralised execution constraints. To access the global utility functions while preserving the decentralised execution, we propose an Agent-Attention Multi-Agent Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning (AA-MAMORL) framework. Our approach implicitly learns a joint belief over other agents’ utility functions and their associated policies during centralised training, effectively mapping global states and utilities to each agent's policy. During execution, each agent independently selects actions based on local observations and its private utility function to approximate a BNE, without relying on inter-agent communication. We evaluate our framework through extensive experiments in a custom-designed MAMO Particle environment and the standard MOMALand benchmark. The results demonstrate that accessibility to global preferences and our proposed AA-MAMORL significantly improves performance and consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on3
- Demystify Mamba in Vision: A Linear Attention PerspectiveDongchen Han, Ziyi Wang, Zhuofan Xia, Yizeng Han et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 287 citations
- Maximizing utility in multi-agent environments by anticipating the behavior of other learnersAngelos Assos, Yuval Dagan, Constantinos DaskalakisNeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations
- GTDE: Grouped Training with Decentralized Execution for Multi-agent Actor-CriticMengxian Li, Qi Wang, Yongjun XuAAAI 2025 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Distributional Pareto-Optimal Multi-Objective Reinforcement LearningXin-Qiang Cai, Pushi Zhang, Li Zhao, Jiang Bian et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 46 citations
- Pareto Set Learning for Multi-Objective Reinforcement LearningErlong Liu, Yu-Chang Wu, Xiaobin Huang, Chengrui Gao et al.AAAI 2025 · 24 citations
- On Generalization Across Environments In Multi-Objective Reinforcement LearningJayden Teoh, Pradeep Varakantham, Peter VamplewICLR 2025
- Federated Multi-Objective LearningHaibo Yang, Zhuqing Liu, Jia Liu, Chaosheng Dong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 28 citations
- PD-MORL: Preference-Driven Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning AlgorithmToygun Basaklar, Suat Gumussoy, Ümit Y. OgrasICLR 2023 · 8 citations
