Teaching Language Models to Hallucinate Less with Synthetic Tasks
Erik Jones, Hamid Palangi, Clarisse Simões, Varun Chandrasekaran, Subhabrata Mukherjee, Arindam Mitra, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Ece Kamar
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) frequently hallucinate on abstractive summarization tasks such as document-based question-answering, meeting summarization, and clinical report generation, even though all necessary information is included in context. However, optimizing LLMs to hallucinate less on these tasks is challenging, as hallucination is hard to efficiently evaluate at each optimization step. In this work, we show that reducing hallucination on a synthetic task can also reduce hallucination on real-world downstream tasks. Our method, SynTra, first designs a synthetic task where hallucinations are easy to elicit and measure. It next optimizes the LLM's system message via prefix-tuning on the synthetic task, and finally transfers the system message to realistic, hard-to-optimize tasks. Across three realistic abstractive summarization tasks, SynTra reduces hallucination for two 13B-parameter LLMs using only a synthetic retrieval task for supervision. We also find that optimizing the system message rather than the model weights can be critical; fine-tuning the entire model on the synthetic task can counterintuitively increase hallucination. Overall, SynTra demonstrates that the extra flexibility of working with synthetic data can help mitigate undesired behaviors in practice.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers9
- Evolutionary Large Language Model for Automated Feature TransformationNanxu Gong, Chandan K. Reddy, Wangyang Ying, Haifeng Chen et al.AAAI 2025 · 39 citations
- Multimodal Reasoning with Multimodal Knowledge GraphJunlin Lee, Yequan Wang, Jing Li, Min ZhangACL 2024 · 29 citations
- Improving Factuality in Large Language Models via Decoding-Time Hallucinatory and Truthful ComparatorsDingkang Yang, Dongling Xiao, Jinjie Wei, Mingcheng Li et al.AAAI 2025 · 17 citations
- Knowledge Verification to Nip Hallucination in the BudFanqi Wan, Xinting Huang, Leyang Cui, Xiaojun Quan et al.EMNLP 2024 · 8 citations
- Automatically Generating Numerous Context-Driven SFT Data for LLMs Across Diverse GranularityShanghaoran QuanAAAI 2025 · 7 citations
Builds on20
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
Related papers
- On Synthesizing Data for Context Attribution in Question AnsweringGorjan Radevski, Kiril Gashteovski, Shahbaz Syed, Christopher Malon et al.ACL 2025 · 1 citation
- SCOPE: A Self-supervised Framework for Improving Faithfulness in Conditional Text GenerationSong Duong, Florian Le Bronnec, Alexandre Allauzen, Vincent Guigue et al.ICLR 2025
- Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for GenerationXiang Lisa Li, Percy LiangACL 2021
- LLMInertia: Adaptive Counter-Inertial Reasoning to Improve Evidence Faithfulness in Large Language ModelsXinxin You, Xien Liu, Chenwei Yan, Siqi Song et al.ICML 2026
- Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Multilingual SummarisationYifu Qiu, Yftah Ziser, Anna Korhonen, Edoardo Maria Ponti et al.EMNLP 2023 · 12 citations
