Fast and Accurate Factual Inconsistency Detection Over Long Documents
Barrett Martin Lattimer, Patrick Chen, Xinyuan Zhang, Yi Yang
Abstract
Generative AI models exhibit remarkable potential; however, hallucinations across various tasks present a significant challenge, particularly for longer inputs that current approaches struggle to address effectively. We introduce SCALE (Source Chunking Approach for Large-scale inconsistency Evaluation), a task-agnostic model for detecting factual inconsistencies using a novel chunking strategy. Specifically, SCALE is a Natural language inference (NLI) based model that uses large text chunks to condition over long texts. This approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in factual inconsistency detection for diverse tasks and long inputs. Additionally, we leverage the chunking mechanism and employ a novel algorithm to explain SCALE's decisions through relevant source sentence retrieval. Our evaluations reveal that SCALE outperforms existing methods on both standard benchmarks and a new long-form dialogue dataset ScreenEval we constructed. Moreover, SCALE surpasses competitive systems in efficiency and model explanation evaluations. We have released our code and data publicly to GitHub 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- FoRAG: Factuality-optimized Retrieval Augmented Generation for Web-enhanced Long-form Question AnsweringTianchi Cai, Zhiwen Tan, Xierui Song, Tao Sun et al.KDD 2024 · 11 citations
- AssoMem: Scalable Memory QA with Multi-Signal Associative RetrievalKai Zhang, Xinyuan Zhang, Ejaz Ahmed, Hongda Jiang et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- PRISMM-Bench: A Benchmark of Peer-Review Grounded Multimodal InconsistenciesLukas Selch, Yufang Hou, Muhammad Jehanzeb Mirza, Sivan Doveh et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Hidden in Plain Sight: Reasoning in Underspecified and Misspecified Scenarios for Multimodal LLMsQianqi Yan, Hongquan Li, Shan Jiang, Yang Zhao et al.EMNLP 2025
- How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate across Languages? On Realistic Multilingual Estimation of LLM HallucinationSaad Obaid ul Islam, Anne Lauscher, Goran GlavasEMNLP 2025
Builds on13
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2020 · 602 citations
- Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of SummariesAlex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, Mike LewisACL 2020 · 317 citations
- Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text GenerationMing Zhong, Yang Liu, Da Yin, Yuning Mao et al.EMNLP 2022 · 103 citations
Related papers
- AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with A Unified Alignment FunctionYuheng Zha, Yichi Yang, Ruichen Li, Zhiting HuACL 2023 · 44 citations
- SummEdits: Measuring LLM Ability at Factual Reasoning Through The Lens of SummarizationPhilippe Laban, Wojciech Kryscinski, Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander R. Fabbri et al.EMNLP 2023 · 29 citations
- Non-Existent Relationship: Fact-Aware Multi-Level Machine-Generated Text DetectionYang Wu, Ruijia Wang, Jie WuEMNLP 2025
- Knowledge Verification to Nip Hallucination in the BudFanqi Wan, Xinting Huang, Leyang Cui, Xiaojun Quan et al.EMNLP 2024 · 8 citations
- FACT: Mitigating Inconsistent Hallucinations in LLMs via Fact-Driven Alternating Code-Text TrainingXinxin You, Qixin Sun, Chenwei Yan, Xiao Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025
