Probabilistic Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Formal Interpretability
Yanran Wang, Qiuchen Qian, David Boyle
Abstract
Reinforcement learning can provide effective reasoning for sequential decision-making problems with variable dynamics. Such reasoning in practical implementation, however, poses a persistent challenge in interpreting the reward function and the corresponding optimal policy. Consequently, representing sequential decision-making problems as probabilistic inference can have considerable value, as, in principle, the inference offers diverse and powerful mathematical tools to infer the stochastic dynamics whilst suggesting a probabilistic interpretation of policy optimization. In this study, we propose a novel Adaptive Wasserstein Variational Optimization, namely AWaVO, to tackle these interpretability challenges. Our approach uses formal methods to achieve the interpretability for convergence guarantee, training transparency, and intrinsic decision-interpretation. To demonstrate its practicality, we showcase guaranteed interpretability with a global convergence rate Θ(1/ √ T ) in simulation and in practical quadrotor tasks. In comparison with state-of-the-art benchmarks, including TRPO-IPO, PCPO, and CRPO, we empirically verify that AWaVO offers a reasonable trade-off between high performance and sufficient interpretability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9142710e-bff2-490a-8b02-0e1d4ef43867Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Projection-Based Constrained Policy OptimizationTsung-Yen Yang, Justinian Rosca, Karthik Narasimhan, Peter J. RamadgeICLR 2020 · 306 citations
- IPO: Interior-Point Policy Optimization under ConstraintsYongshuai Liu, Jiaxin Ding, Xin LiuAAAI 2020 · 231 citations
- CRPO: A New Approach for Safe Reinforcement Learning with Convergence GuaranteeTengyu Xu, Yingbin Liang, Guanghui LanICML 2021 · 171 citations
- Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?Yilun Zhou, Serena Booth, Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Julie ShahAAAI 2022 · 167 citations
- Statistical and Topological Properties of Sliced Probability DivergencesKimia Nadjahi, Alain Durmus, Lénaïc Chizat, Soheil Kolouri et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 115 citations
Related papers
- Risk-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning: A Generalized Approach for Adapting to Varying Risk MeasuresGwangpyo Yoo, Jinwoo Park, Honguk WooAAAI 2024 · 3 citations
- Outcome-Driven Reinforcement Learning via Variational InferenceTim G. J. Rudner, Vitchyr Pong, Rowan McAllister, Yarin Gal et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 24 citations
- Visual Transfer For Reinforcement Learning Via Wasserstein Domain ConfusionJosh Roy, George Dimitri KonidarisAAAI 2021 · 16 citations
- Think Less, Act Early: Reinforced Latent Reasoning with Early Exit in Vision-Language-Action ModelsDianqiao Lei, Lianlei ShanICML 2026
- Wasserstein Auto-encoded MDPs: Formal Verification of Efficiently Distilled RL Policies with Many-sided GuaranteesFlorent Delgrange, Ann Nowé, Guillermo A. PérezICLR 2023
