Wasserstein Auto-encoded MDPs: Formal Verification of Efficiently Distilled RL Policies with Many-sided Guarantees
Florent Delgrange, Ann Nowé, Guillermo A. Pérez
Abstract
Although deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has many success stories, the large-scale deployment of policies learned through these advanced techniques in safety-critical scenarios is hindered by their lack of formal guarantees. Variational Markov Decision Processes (VAE-MDPs) are discrete latent space models that provide a reliable framework for distilling formally verifiable controllers from any RL policy. While the related guarantees address relevant practical aspects such as the satisfaction of performance and safety properties, the VAE approach suffers from several learning flaws (posterior collapse, slow learning speed, poor dynamics estimates), primarily due to the absence of abstraction and representation guarantees to support latent optimization. We introduce the Wasserstein auto-encoded MDP (WAE-MDP), a latent space model that fixes those issues by minimizing a penalized form of the optimal transport between the behaviors of the agent executing the original policy and the distilled policy, for which the formal guarantees apply. Our approach yields bisimulation guarantees while learning the distilled policy, allowing concrete optimization of the abstraction and representation model quality. Our experiments show that, besides distilling policies up to 10 times faster, the latent model quality is indeed better in general. Moreover, we present experiments from a simple time-to-failure verification algorithm on the latent space. The fact that our approach enables such simple verification techniques highlights its applicability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f8f48aa4-cc36-4ef0-9b4e-17f928ec4fdeCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without ReconstructionAmy Zhang, Rowan Thomas McAllister, Roberto Calandra, Yarin Gal et al.ICLR 2021 · 77 citations
- DeepSynth: Automata Synthesis for Automatic Task Segmentation in Deep Reinforcement LearningMohammadhosein Hasanbeig, Natasha Yogananda Jeppu, Alessandro Abate, Tom Melham et al.AAAI 2021 · 62 citations
- Collapsed Amortized Variational Inference for Switching Nonlinear Dynamical SystemsZhe Dong, Bryan A. Seybold, Kevin Murphy, Hung H. BuiICML 2020 · 37 citations
- Steady State Analysis of Episodic Reinforcement LearningBojun HuangNeurIPS 2020 · 29 citations
- SimSR: Simple Distance-Based State Representations for Deep Reinforcement LearningHongyu Zang, Xin Li, Mingzhong WangAAAI 2022 · 20 citations
Related papers
- Distillation of RL Policies with Formal Guarantees via Variational Abstraction of Markov Decision ProcessesFlorent Delgrange, Ann Nowé, Guillermo A. PérezAAAI 2022 · 14 citations
- Latent Wasserstein Adversarial Imitation LearningSiqi Yang, Kai Yan, Alex Schwing, Yu-Xiong WangICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Transferable Reinforcement Learning via Probabilistic Latent Embeddings and Dynamic Policy Adaptation for Sim-to-Real DeploymentGengyue Han, Yiheng FengICML 2026
- To Distill or Decide? Understanding the Algorithmic Trade-off in Partially Observable RLYuda Song, Dhruv Rohatgi, Aarti Singh, J. Andrew BagnellNeurIPS 2025
- Statistical Regeneration Guarantees of the Wasserstein Autoencoder with Latent Space ConsistencyAnish Chakrabarty, Swagatam DasNeurIPS 2021 · 10 citations
