Toward Conservative Planning from Human-AI Preferences in Reinforcement Learning
Huazhong Wang, Wenzhuo Zhou
Abstract
We study reinforcement learning (RL) with trajectory preferences, where the RL agent does not receive explicit rewards at each step but instead receives human-AI preferences over pairs of trajectories. Despite growing interest in preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL), contemporary works cannot robustly learn policies in offline settings with poor data coverage and often lack algorithmic tractability. We propose a novel Model-based Conservative Planning (MCP) algorithm for offline PbRL, which leverages a general function class and uses a tractable conservative learning framework to improve the policy upon an arbitrary reference policy. We prove that, MCP can compete with the best policy within data coverage when the reference policy is supported by the data. To the best of our knowledge, MCP is the first provably sample-efficient and computationally tractable offline PbRL algorithm under partial data coverage, without requiring known transition dynamics. We further demonstrate that, with certain structural properties in PbRL dynamics, our algorithm can effectively exploit these structures to relax the partial data coverage requirement and improve regret guarantees. We evaluate MCP on a comprehensive suite of human-in-the-loop benchmarks in Meta-World. Experimental results show that our algorithm achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art offline PbRL algorithms. Our code is provided at https://github.com/Rshias/MCP.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 90b3c8f0-482a-4139-a411-0f628d0f3226Builds on33
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Policy Optimization for Offline Preference-based Reinforcement LearningHyungkyu Kang, Min-hwan OhICLR 2025
- Human-in-the-loop: Provably Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with General Function ApproximationXiaoyu Chen, Han Zhong, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran Wang et al.ICML 2022 · 90 citations
- Beyond Reward: Offline Preference-guided Policy OptimizationYachen Kang, Diyuan Shi, Jinxin Liu, Li He et al.ICML 2023 · 41 citations
- Provable Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement LearningWenhao Zhan, Masatoshi Uehara, Nathan Kallus, Jason D. Lee et al.ICLR 2024 · 50 citations
- Offline Preference-Based Value OptimizationHyungkyu Kang, Min-hwan OhICLR 2026
