Offline Preference-Based Value Optimization
Hyungkyu Kang, Min-hwan Oh
Abstract
We study the problem of offline preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL), where the agent learns from pre-collected preference data by comparing trajectory pairs. While prior work has established theoretical foundations for offline PbRL, existing algorithms face significant practical limitations: some rely on computationally intractable optimization procedures, while others suffer from unstable training and high performance variance. To address these challenges, we propose Preference-based Value Optimization (PVO), a simple and practical algorithm that achieves both strong empirical performance and theoretical guarantees. PVO directly optimizes the value function consistent with preference feedback by minimizing a novel value alignment loss. We prove that PVO attains a rate-optimal sample complexity of , and further show that the value alignment loss is applicable not only to value-based methods but also to actor–critic algorithms. Empirically, PVO achieves robust and stable performance across diverse continuous control benchmarks. It consistently outperforms strong baselines, including methods without theoretical guarantees, while requiring no additional hyperparameters for preference learning. Moreover, our ablation study demonstrates that substituting the standard TD loss with the value alignment loss substantially improves learning from preference data, confirming its effectiveness for PbRL.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 31f72b5c-c702-45fa-b84b-3308df888b24Builds on41
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical PrecipiceRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,067 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Policy Optimization for Offline Preference-based Reinforcement LearningHyungkyu Kang, Min-hwan OhICLR 2025
- Beyond Reward: Offline Preference-guided Policy OptimizationYachen Kang, Diyuan Shi, Jinxin Liu, Li He et al.ICML 2023 · 41 citations
- Toward Conservative Planning from Human-AI Preferences in Reinforcement LearningHuazhong Wang, Wenzhuo ZhouICLR 2026
- Preference Elicitation for Offline Reinforcement LearningAlizée Pace, Bernhard Schölkopf, Gunnar Rätsch, Giorgia RamponiICLR 2025
- Behaviour Preference Regression for Offline Reinforcement LearningPadmanaba Srinivasan, William KnottenbeltAAAI 2025
