Towards Consistency in Adversarial Classification
Laurent Meunier, Raphael Ettedgui, Rafael Pinot, Yann Chevaleyre, Jamal Atif
Abstract
In this paper, we study the problem of consistency in the context of adversarial examples. Specifically, we tackle the following question: can surrogate losses still be used as a proxy for minimizing the loss in the presence of an adversary that alters the inputs at test-time? Different from the standard classification task, this question cannot be reduced to a point-wise minimization problem, and calibration needs not to be sufficient to ensure consistency. In this paper, we expose some pathological behaviors specific to the adversarial problem, and show that no convex surrogate loss can be consistent or calibrated in this context. It is therefore necessary to design another class of surrogate functions that can be used to solve the adversarial consistency issue. As a first step towards designing such a class, we identify sufficient and necessary conditions for a surrogate loss to be calibrated in both the adversarial and standard settings. Finally, we give some directions for building a class of losses that could be consistent in the adversarial framework.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 90b13eb8-d048-45ee-b2d8-b5bb6a8893b7Cited by top-tier papers4
- Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and ApplicationsAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2023 · 790 citations
- Adversarial Training Should Be Cast as a Non-Zero-Sum GameAlexander Robey, Fabian Latorre, George J. Pappas, Hamed Hassani et al.ICLR 2024 · 16 citations
- The Adversarial Consistency of Surrogate Risks for Binary ClassificationNatalie Frank, Jonathan Niles-WeedNeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- Adversarial Robustness in Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer: Algorithms and GuaranteesYannis Montreuil, Axel Carlier, Lai Xing Ng, Wei Tsang OoiICML 2025
Builds on5
- Randomization matters How to defend against strong adversarial attacksRafael Pinot, Raphael Ettedgui, Geovani Rizk, Yann Chevaleyre et al.ICML 2020 · 66 citations
- Adversarial Risk via Optimal Transport and Optimal CouplingsMuni Sreenivas Pydi, Varun S. JogICML 2020 · 60 citations
- Calibration and Consistency of Adversarial Surrogate LossesPranjal Awasthi, Natalie Frank, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 59 citations
- The Many Faces of Adversarial RiskMuni Sreenivas Pydi, Varun S. JogNeurIPS 2021 · 33 citations
- Mixed Nash Equilibria in the Adversarial Examples GameLaurent Meunier, Meyer Scetbon, Rafael Pinot, Jamal Atif et al.ICML 2021 · 32 citations
Related papers
- H-Consistency Bounds for Surrogate Loss MinimizersPranjal Awasthi, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2022 · 50 citations
- Multi-Class -Consistency BoundsPranjal Awasthi, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2022 · 48 citations
- On the consistency of top-k surrogate lossesForest Yang, Sanmi KoyejoICML 2020 · 54 citations
- Consistency Conditions for Differentiable Surrogate LossesDrona Khurana, Anish Thilagar, Dhamma Kimpara, Rafael M. FrongilloNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Generalizing Consistent Multi-Class Classification with Rejection to be Compatible with Arbitrary LossesYuzhou Cao, Tianchi Cai, Lei Feng, Lihong Gu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 42 citations
