H-Consistency Bounds for Surrogate Loss Minimizers
Pranjal Awasthi, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao Zhong
Abstract
We present a detailed study of estimation errors in terms of surrogate loss estimation errors. We refer to such guarantees as H-consistency bounds, since they account for the hypothesis set H adopted. These guarantees are significantly stronger than H-calibration or H-consistency. They are also more informative than similar excess error bounds derived in the literature, when H is the family of all measurable functions. We prove general theorems providing such guarantees, for both the distribution-dependent and distribution-independent settings. We show that our bounds are tight, modulo a convexity assumption. We also show that previous excess error bounds can be recovered as special cases of our general results. We then present a series of explicit bounds in the case of the zero-one loss, with multiple choices of the surrogate loss and for both the family of linear functions and neural networks with one hidden-layer. We further prove more favorable distribution-dependent guarantees in that case. We also present a series of explicit bounds in the case of the adversarial loss, with surrogate losses based on the supremum of the ρ-margin, hinge or sigmoid loss and for the same two general hypothesis sets. Here too, we prove several enhancements of these guarantees under natural distributional assumptions. Finally, we report the results of simulations illustrating our bounds and their tightness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 24ff50da-9872-4577-9265-ad8efb108941Cited by top-tier papers29
- Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and ApplicationsAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2023 · 790 citations
- Two-Stage Learning to Defer with Multiple ExpertsAnqi Mao, Christopher Mohri, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2023 · 98 citations
- Multi-Class -Consistency BoundsPranjal Awasthi, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2022 · 48 citations
- Revisiting Discriminative vs. Generative Classifiers: Theory and ImplicationsChenyu Zheng, Guoqiang Wu, Fan Bao, Yue Cao et al.ICML 2023 · 40 citations
- Realizable H-Consistent and Bayes-Consistent Loss Functions for Learning to DeferAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
Builds on13
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- A Universal Law of Robustness via IsoperimetrySébastien Bubeck, Mark SellkeNeurIPS 2021 · 260 citations
- Adversarial Learning Guarantees for Linear Hypotheses and Neural NetworksPranjal Awasthi, Natalie Frank, Mehryar MohriICML 2020 · 65 citations
- Calibration and Consistency of Adversarial Surrogate LossesPranjal Awasthi, Natalie Frank, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 59 citations
Related papers
- Towards Consistency in Adversarial ClassificationLaurent Meunier, Raphael Ettedgui, Rafael Pinot, Yann Chevaleyre et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 12 citations
- H-Consistency Bounds: Characterization and ExtensionsAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
- A Universal Growth Rate for Learning with Smooth Surrogate LossesAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2024 · 27 citations
- Structured Prediction with Stronger Consistency GuaranteesAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2023 · 37 citations
- H-Consistency Guarantees for RegressionAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2024 · 18 citations
