EducationQ: Evaluating LLMs' Teaching Capabilities Through Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework
Yao Shi, Rongkeng Liang, Yong Xu
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as educational tools, yet evaluating their teaching capabilities remains challenging due to the resource-intensive, context-dependent, and methodologically complex nature of teacher-student interactions. We introduce EducationQ, a multi-agent dialogue framework that efficiently assesses teaching capabilities through simulated dynamic educational scenarios, featuring specialized agents for teaching, learning, and evaluation. Testing 14 LLMs across major AI Organizations (OpenAI, Meta, Google, Anthropic, and others) on 1,498 questions spanning 13 disciplines and 10 difficulty levels reveals that teaching effectiveness does not correlate linearly with model scale or general reasoning capabilities - with some smaller open-source models outperforming larger commercial counterparts in teaching contexts. This finding highlights a critical gap in current evaluations that prioritize knowledge recall over interactive pedagogy. Our mixed-methods evaluation, combining quantitative metrics with qualitative analysis and expert case studies, identifies distinct pedagogical strengths employed by top-performing models (e.g., sophisticated questioning strategies, adaptive feedback mechanisms). Human expert evaluations show 78% agreement with our automated qualitative analysis of effective teaching behaviors, validating our methodology. EducationQ demonstrates that LLMs-as-teachers require specialized optimization beyond simple scaling, suggesting next-generation educational AI prioritize targeted enhancement of specific pedagogical effectiveness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8fb69229-3972-4269-84aa-5512da94ac3eCited by top-tier papers5
- A Theory of Adaptive Scaffolding for LLM-Based Pedagogical AgentsClayton Cohn, Surya Rayala, Namrata Srivastava, Joyce Horn Fonteles et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Position: LLMs Can be Good Tutors in English EducationJingheng Ye, Shen Wang, Deqing Zou, Yibo Yan et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- EduBench: A Comprehensive Benchmarking Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Diverse Educational ScenariosBin Xu, Yu Bai, Huashan Sun, Yiguan Lin et al.ACL 2026
- Teach2Eval: An Interaction-Driven LLMs Evaluation Method via Teaching EffectivenessYuhang Zhou, Xutian Chen, Yixin Cao, Yuchen Ni et al.ICLR 2026
- Beyond Self-Report: Bridging the Intention-Behavior Gap in Critical Thinking Assessment via Interpretable Multi-Agent SystemZekun Li, Jifan Yu, Haoxuan Li, Ye He et al.ACL 2026
Builds on9
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
- Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP TasksYizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi et al.EMNLP 2022 · 238 citations
Related papers
- Dr.Academy: A Benchmark for Evaluating Questioning Capability in Education for Large Language ModelsYuyan Chen, Songzhou Yan, Panjun Liu, Yanghua XiaoACL 2024 · 8 citations
- Can Large Language Models Be Good Language Teachers?LiQing Xu, Qiwei Li, Tianshuo Peng, Zuchao Li et al.EMNLP 2025
- EduAdapt: A Question Answer Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Grade-Level Adaptability in LLMsNumaan Naeem, Abdellah El Mekki, Muhammad Abdul-MageedEMNLP 2025
- Simulated Students in Tutoring Dialogues: Substance or Illusion?Alexander Scarlatos, Jaewook Lee, Simon Woodhead, Andrew LanACL 2026 · 6 citations
- Grounded in Reality: Learning and Deploying Proactive LLM from Offline LogsFei Wei, Daoyuan Chen, Ce Wang, Yilun Huang et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
