The ACUTE Protocol: Operationalizing Language Model Activations for Better Calibration, Utility, and Trust
Nishant Subramani, Palash Goyal, Yiwen Song, Mani Malek, Yuan Xue, Tomas Pfister, Hamid Palangi
Abstract
As language models improve and become increasingly deployed to solve a variety of tasks, trustworthiness becomes essential. Calibration is a good proxy for trust: well-calibrated confidence estimates help inform the risk versus reward trade-off when trusting a specific model output. Unfortunately, even as models improve, they remain poorly calibrated, often biasing towards overconfidence. Additionally, calibration can be gamed: a policy that always predicts the base rate is perfectly calibrated, but completely uninformative. To resolve this, we develop a new metric, expected utility renormalized by the oracle (EURO) , that balances calibration and informativeness. We also propose a general-purpose activation-based confidence, utility, and trust estimation protocol (ACUTE) to appropriately adjudicate uncertainty. The ACUTE protocol provides flexible, sample-efficient, and compute-efficient confidence estimators for 3 tasks including multiple choice question answering, tool-calling, and scientific document summarization across 6 models from 4 model families. ACUTE outperforms strong baselines on EURO, while maintaining low calibration error. Taken together, our work shows that equipping LLMs with the ACUTE protocol can improve calibration, utility, and trustworthiness in numerous settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on10
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
- Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic InterpretabilityArthur Conmy, Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Aengus Lynch, Stefan Heimersheim et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 861 citations
- Function Vectors in Large Language ModelsEric Todd, Millicent L. Li, Arnab Sen Sharma, Aaron Mueller et al.ICLR 2024 · 229 citations
Related papers
- MetaFaith: Faithful Natural Language Uncertainty Expression in LLMsGabrielle Kaili-May Liu, Gal Yona, Avi Caciularu, Idan Szpektor et al.EMNLP 2025
- Calibrating the Confidence of Large Language Models by Eliciting FidelityMozhi Zhang, Mianqiu Huang, Rundong Shi, Linsen Guo et al.EMNLP 2024 · 5 citations
- OpenEstimate: Evaluating LLMs on Reasoning Under Uncertainty with Real-World DataAlana Renda, Jillian Ross, Jacob AndreasICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Confidence Should Be Calibrated More Than One Turn DeepZhaohan Zhang, Chengzhengxu Li, Xiaoming Liu, Chao Shen et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations OnlyDennis Ulmer, Martin Gubri, Hwaran Lee, Sangdoo Yun et al.ACL 2024
