Reliable and Diverse Evaluation of LLM Medical Knowledge Mastery
Yuxuan Zhou, Xien Liu, Chen Ning, Xiao Zhang, Ji Wu
Abstract
Mastering medical knowledge is crucial for medical-specific LLMs. However, despite the existence of medical benchmarks like MedQA, a unified framework that fully leverages existing knowledge bases to evaluate LLMs' mastery of medical knowledge is still lacking. We propose PretexEval, a novel framework that dynamically generates reliable and diverse test samples to evaluate LLMs for any given medical knowledge base. We notice that test samples produced directly from knowledge bases by templates or LLMs may introduce factual errors and also lack diversity. To address these issues, our framework employs predicate equivalence transformations to produce a series of variants for any given medical knowledge point. Finally, these produced predicate variants are converted into textual language, resulting in a series of reliable and diverse test samples. Here, we use our proposed framework to systematically investigate the mastery of medical factual knowledge of 12 well-known LLMs, based on two knowledge bases that are crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The evaluation results illustrate that current LLMs still exhibit significant deficiencies in fully mastering medical knowledge, despite achieving considerable success on some famous public benchmarks. These new findings provide valuable insights for developing medical-specific LLMs, highlighting that current LLMs urgently need to strengthen their comprehensive and in-depth mastery of medical knowledge before being applied to real-world medical scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8e3662fc-b1e7-4b22-a043-04e4f7a81acdCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning TasksKaijie Zhu, Jiaao Chen, Jindong Wang, Neil Zhenqiang Gong et al.ICLR 2024 · 92 citations
- Rewire-then-Probe: A Contrastive Recipe for Probing Biomedical Knowledge of Pre-trained Language ModelsZaiqiao Meng, Fangyu Liu, Ehsan Shareghi, Yixuan Su et al.ACL 2022 · 36 citations
Related papers
- MedBench: A Large-Scale Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Medical Large Language ModelsYan Cai, Linlin Wang, Ye Wang, Gerard de Melo et al.AAAI 2024 · 42 citations
- MediQ: Question-Asking LLMs and a Benchmark for Reliable Interactive Clinical ReasoningShuyue Stella Li, Vidhisha Balachandran, Shangbin Feng, Jonathan Ilgen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 215 citations
- MedMKEB: A Comprehensive Knowledge Editing Benchmark for Medical Multimodal Large Language ModelsDexuan Xu, Jieyi Wang, Zhongyan Chai, Yongzhi Cao et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Inflated Excellence or True Performance? Rethinking Medical Diagnostic Benchmarks with Dynamic EvaluationXiangxu Zhang, Lei Li, Yanyun Zhou, Xiao Zhou et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and UnderstandingYuxin Zuo, Shang Qu, Yifei Li, Zhang-Ren Chen et al.ICML 2025
