CK12: A Rounded K12 Knowledge Graph Based Benchmark for Chinese Holistic Cognition Evaluation
Weihao You, Pengcheng Wang, Changlong Li, Zhilong Ji, Jinfeng Bai
Abstract
New NLP benchmarks are urgently needed to align with the rapid development of large language models (LLMs). We present a meticulously designed evaluation benchmark that leverages the knowledge graph. This evaluation comprises 584 level-1 knowledge points and 1,989 level-2 knowledge points, thereby encompassing a comprehensive spectrum of the K12 education domain knowledge. The primary objective is to comprehensively assess the high-level comprehension aptitude and reasoning capabilities of LLMs operating within the Chinese context. Our evaluation incorporates five distinct question types with 39,452 questions. We test the current mainstream LLMs by three distinct modes. Firstly, four prompt evaluation modes were employed to assess the fundamental capacity. Additionally, for choice questions, a result-oriented evaluation approach was designed through data augmentation to assess the model's proficiency in advanced knowledge and reasoning. Moreover, a subset with reasoning process is derived, and the process-oriented testing method is used to test the model's interpretability and higher-order reasoning capacity. We further show models' capability in our knowledge points, and anticipate the evaluation can assist in the assessment of the strengths and deficiencies of LLMs on knowledge points, thus fostering their development within the Chinese context. Our Dataset will be publicly available in https://github.com/tal-tech/chinese-k12-evaluation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8e16bcae-a92d-48b9-8b64-4a9c594e1c17Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
Related papers
- MedBench: A Large-Scale Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Medical Large Language ModelsYan Cai, Linlin Wang, Ye Wang, Gerard de Melo et al.AAAI 2024 · 42 citations
- Can Large Language Models Be Good Language Teachers?LiQing Xu, Qiwei Li, Tianshuo Peng, Zuchao Li et al.EMNLP 2025
- MDK12-Bench: A Multi-Discipline Benchmark for Evaluating Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language ModelsPengfei Zhou, Xiaopeng Peng, Fanrui Zhang, Zhaopan Xu et al.AAAI 2026
- Benchmarking Chinese Commonsense Reasoning of LLMs: From Chinese-Specifics to Reasoning-Memorization CorrelationsJiaxing Sun, Weiquan Huang, Jiang Wu, Chenya Gu et al.ACL 2024
- SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language ModelsZhexin Zhang, Leqi Lei, Lindong Wu, Rui Sun et al.ACL 2024
