Enhancing Self-Efficacy in Health Self-Examination through Conversational Agent's Encouragement
Naja Kathrine Kollerup, Maria-Theresa Bahodi, Samuel Rhys Cox, Niels van Berkel
Abstract
Health self-examination, such as checking for changes to skin moles, is key to identifying potential negative changes to one's body. A major barrier to initiating a self-examination is a perceived lack of confidence or knowledge. In this study, we use a 2 × 2 between-subjects design to evaluate the effect of an AI conversational agent (CA) on participant self-efficacy and trust. We manipulated both participants' perceived skill in self-examination (based on prior perceived Success vs. Failure) and the CA's verbal persuasions (Encouraging vs. Neutral), with participants asked to complete a series of skin self-assessment tasks. Our findings show that participants' self-efficacy increased when exposed to encouraging CA persuasion. Additionally, we observed that an encouraging CA significantly increased participants' trust scores in perceived benevolence compared to a neutral-sounding CA. Our results inform the design of CAs to support users' independent self-examination.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8dcb7de5-6ba9-4a28-9968-ab2dc26175fdBuilds on7
- How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical MethodologiesOleksandra Vereschak, Gilles Bailly, Baptiste CaramiauxCSCW 2021 · 227 citations
- Measuring and Understanding Trust Calibrations for Automated Systems: A Survey of the State-Of-The-Art and Future DirectionsMagdalena Wischnewski, Nicole C. Krämer, Emmanuel MüllerCHI 2023 · 135 citations
- Harnessing Biomedical Literature to Calibrate Clinicians' Trust in AI Decision Support SystemsQian Yang, Yuexing Hao, Kexin Quan, Stephen Yang et al.CHI 2023 · 69 citations
- Computers as Bad Social Actors: Dark Patterns and Anti-Patterns in Interfaces that Act SociallyLize Alberts, Ulrik Lyngs, Max Van KleekCSCW 2024 · 46 citations
- Cognitive Forcing for Better Decision-Making: Reducing Overreliance on AI Systems Through Partial ExplanationsSander de Jong, Ville Paananen, Benjamin Tag, Niels van BerkelCSCW 2025 · 32 citations
Related papers
- "It Became My Buddy, But I'm Not Afraid to Disagree": A Multi-Session Study of UX Evaluators Collaborating with Conversational AI AssistantsEmily Kuang, Ehsan Jahangirzadeh Soure, Luyao Shen, Nitesh Goyal et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Virtual Agent-based Communication Skills Training to Facilitate Health Persuasion Among PeersFarnaz Nouraei, Keith Rebello, Mina Fallah, Prasanth Murali et al.CSCW 2025 · 9 citations
- Assertiveness-based Agent Communication for a Personalized Medicine on Medical Imaging DiagnosisFrancisco Maria Calisto, João Gabriel de Matos Fernandes, Margarida Morais, Carlos Santiago et al.CHI 2023 · 94 citations
- Large Language Model Agents for Improving Engagement with Behavior Change Interventions: Application to Digital MindfulnessHarsh Kumar, Suhyeon Yoo, Angela M. Zavaleta Bernuy, Jiakai Shi et al.CSCW 2025 · 7 citations
- Personal Validation Effect in LLMs: Positive AI Responses Bias Perceptions of Validity, Reliability, Personalization, and Usefulness of Fictitious PredictionsPat Pataranutaporn, Eunhae Lee, Judith Amores, Pattie MaesCHI 2026 · 1 citation
