Crosscoding Through Time: Tracking Emergence & Consolidation Of Linguistic Representations Throughout LLM Pretraining
Deniz Bayazit, Aaron Mueller, Antoine Bosselut
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) learn non-trivial abstractions during pretraining, such as detecting irregular plural noun subjects. However, because traditional evaluation methods (e.g., benchmarking) fail to reveal how models acquire these concepts and capabilities, it is not well understood when and how these specific linguistic abilities emerge. To bridge this gap and better understand model training at the concept level, we use sparse crosscoders to discover and align features across model checkpoints. Using this approach, we track the evolution of linguistic features during pretraining. We train crosscoders between open-sourced checkpoint triplets with significant performance and representation shifts, and introduce a novel metric, Relative Indirect Effects (RelIE), to trace training stages at which individual features become causally important for task performance. We show that crosscoders can detect feature emergence, maintenance, and discontinuation during pretraining. Our approach is architecture-agnostic and scalable, offering a promising path toward more interpretable and fine-grained analysis of representation learning throughout pretraining.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8dc50c42-aaa0-4a0f-ac86-a3ee9d438586Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length ExtrapolationOfir Press, Noah A. Smith, Mike LewisICLR 2022 · 1,168 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic InterpretabilityArthur Conmy, Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Aengus Lynch, Stefan Heimersheim et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 861 citations
- Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMsAngelica Chen, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv, Kyunghyun Cho, Matthew L. Leavitt et al.ICLR 2024 · 119 citations
- Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary LearningDan Braun, Jordan Taylor, Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Lee SharkeyNeurIPS 2024 · 81 citations
Related papers
- Evolution of Concepts in Language Model Pre-TrainingXuyang Ge, Wentao Shu, Jiaxing Wu, Yunhua Zhou et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- How do Transformers Learn Implicit Reasoning?Jiaran Ye, Zijun Yao, Zhidian Huang, Liangming Pan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Evaluating SAE interpretability without generating explanationsGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Analyze Feature Flow to Enhance Interpretation and Steering in Language ModelsDaniil Laptev, Nikita Balagansky, Yaroslav Aksenov, Daniil GavrilovICML 2025
- LinguaLens: Towards Interpreting Linguistic Mechanisms of Large Language Models via Sparse Auto-EncoderYi Jing, Zijun Yao, Hongzhu Guo, Lingxu Ran et al.EMNLP 2025 · 7 citations
