Understanding the Use of Images to Spread COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
Yuping Wang, Chen Ling, Gianluca Stringhini
Abstract
While COVID-19 text misinformation has already been investigated by various scholars, fewer research efforts have been devoted to characterizing and understanding COVID-19 misinformation that is carried out through visuals like photographs and memes. In this paper, we present a mixed-method analysis of image-based COVID-19 misinformation in 2020 on Twitter. We deploy a computational pipeline to identify COVID-19 related tweets, download the images contained in them, and group together visually similar images. We then develop a codebook to characterize COVID-19 misinformation and manually label images as misinformation or not. Finally, we perform a quantitative analysis of tweets containing COVID-19 misinformation images. We identify five types of COVID-19 misinformation, from a wrong understanding of the threat severity of COVID-19 to the promotion of fake cures and conspiracy theories. We also find that tweets containing COVID-19 misinformation images do not receive more interactions than baseline tweets with random images posted by the same set of users. As for temporal properties, COVID-19 misinformation images are shared for longer periods of time than non-misinformation ones, as well as have longer burst times. %added "have'' %RQ2, we compare non-misinformation images instead of random images, and so it is not a direct comparison. When looking at the users sharing COVID-19 misinformation images on Twitter from the perspective of their political leanings, we find that pro-Democrat and pro-Republican users share a similar amount of tweets containing misleading or false COVID-19 images. However, the types of images that they share are different: while pro-Democrat users focus on misleading claims about the Trump administration's response to the pandemic, as well as often sharing manipulated images intended as satire, pro-Republican users often promote hydroxychloroquine, an ineffective medicine against COVID-19, as well as conspiracy theories about the origin of the virus. Our analysis sets a basis for better understanding COVID-19 misinformation images on social media and the nuances in effectively moderate them.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Synthetic Human Memories: AI-Edited Images and Videos Can Implant False Memories and Distort RecollectionPat Pataranutaporn, Chayapatr Archiwaranguprok, Samantha W. T. Chan, Elizabeth F. Loftus et al.CHI 2025 · 14 citations
- Understanding the Effects of AI-based Credibility Indicators When People Are Influenced By Both Peers and ExpertsZhuoran Lu, Patrick Li, Weilong Wang, Ming YinCHI 2025 · 6 citations
- PIXELMOD: Improving Soft Moderation of Visual Misleading Information on TwitterPujan Paudel, Chen Ling, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca StringhiniUSENIX Security 2024 · 4 citations
- "Here's Your Evidence": False Consensus in Public Twitter Discussions of COVID-19 ScienceAlexandros Efstratiou, Marina Efstratiou, Satrio Baskoro Yudhoatmojo, Jeremy Blackburn et al.CSCW 2024 · 3 citations
- A Comparative Study of News Exposure and Consumption On and Off FacebookNardjes Amieur, Salim Chouaki, Oana Goga, Beatrice RoussillonCSCW 2025
Builds on8
- Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science OnlineCrystal Lee, Tanya Yang, Gabrielle D. Inchoco, Graham M. Jones et al.CHI 2021 · 140 citations
- "Go eat a bat, Chang!": On the Emergence of Sinophobic Behavior on Web Communities in the Face of COVID-19Fatemeh Tahmasbi, Leonard Schild, Chen Ling, Jeremy Blackburn et al.WWW 2021 · 92 citations
- Combating Misinformation in Bangladesh: Roles and Responsibilities as Perceived by Journalists, Fact-checkers, and UsersMd Mahfuzul Haque, Mohammad Yousuf, Ahmed Shatil Alam, Pratyasha Saha et al.CSCW 2020 · 84 citations
- Open-Domain, Content-based, Multi-modal Fact-checking of Out-of-Context Images via Online ResourcesSahar Abdelnabi, Rakibul Hasan, Mario FritzCVPR 2022 · 79 citations
- Dissecting the Meme Magic: Understanding Indicators of Virality in Image MemesChen Ling, Ihab AbuHilal, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro et al.CSCW 2021 · 70 citations
Related papers
- Stop the [Image] Steal: The Role and Dynamics of Visual Content in the 2020 U.S. Election Misinformation CampaignHana Matatov, Mor Naaman, Ofra AmirCSCW 2022 · 16 citations
- "Yeah, this graph doesn't show that": Analysis of Online Engagement with Misleading Data VisualizationsMaxim Lisnic, Alexander Lex, Marina KoganCHI 2024 · 16 citations
- Structurizing Misinformation Stories via Rationalizing Fact-ChecksShan Jiang, Christo WilsonACL 2021
- The Impact of Twitter Labels on Misinformation Spread and User Engagement: Lessons from Trump's Election TweetsOrestis Papakyriakopoulos, Ellen P. GoodmannWWW 2022 · 53 citations
- Understanding Effects of Algorithmic vs. Community Label on Perceived Accuracy of Hyper-partisan MisinformationChenyan Jia, Alexander Boltz, Angie Zhang, Anqing Chen et al.CSCW 2022 · 47 citations
