Stop the [Image] Steal: The Role and Dynamics of Visual Content in the 2020 U.S. Election Misinformation Campaign
Hana Matatov, Mor Naaman, Ofra Amir
Abstract
Images are powerful. Visual information can attract attention, improve persuasion, trigger stronger emotions, and is easy to share and spread. We examine the characteristics of the popular images shared on Twitter as part of "Stop the Steal'', the widespread misinformation campaign during the 2020 U.S. election. We analyze the spread of the forty most popular images shared on Twitter as part of this campaign. Using a coding process, we categorize and label the images according to their type, content, origin, and role, and perform a mixed-method analysis of these images' spread on Twitter. Our results show that popular images include both photographs and text rendered as image. Only very few of these popular images included alleged photographic evidence of fraud; and none of the popular photographs had been manipulated. Most images reached a significant portion of their total spread within several hours from their first appearance, and both popular- and less-popular accounts were involved in various stages of their spread.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 345fc124-0fa0-4f3a-a105-ccde49c3d6abCited by top-tier papers4
- "Yeah, this graph doesn't show that": Analysis of Online Engagement with Misleading Data VisualizationsMaxim Lisnic, Alexander Lex, Marina KoganCHI 2024 · 16 citations
- PIXELMOD: Improving Soft Moderation of Visual Misleading Information on TwitterPujan Paudel, Chen Ling, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca StringhiniUSENIX Security 2024 · 4 citations
- With Visual Integrity and Care: A Framework for Mixed Methods Research on Visual Social DataNina Lutz, Joseph S. Schafer, Priya Dhawka, Phil Tinn et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Iterative Netnography and Occurrence for Rapid Research: A Case Study of TikTokNina Lutz, Kiera Hannuksela, Ethan Hynes, Celestine Le et al.CSCW 2026
Builds on5
- Exploring Lightweight Interventions at Posting Time to Reduce the Sharing of Misinformation on Social MediaFarnaz Jahanbakhsh, Amy X. Zhang, Adam J. Berinsky, Gordon Pennycook et al.CSCW 2021 · 116 citations
- Dissecting the Meme Magic: Understanding Indicators of Virality in Image MemesChen Ling, Ihab AbuHilal, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro et al.CSCW 2021 · 70 citations
- Trend Alert: A Cross-Platform Organization Manipulated Twitter Trends in the Indian General ElectionMaurice Jakesch, Kiran Garimella, Dean Eckles, Mor NaamanCSCW 2021 · 46 citations
- Sensemaking and the Chemtrail Conspiracy on the Internet: Insights from Believers and Ex-believersSijia Xiao, Coye Cheshire, Amy S. BruckmanCSCW 2021 · 25 citations
- That's Fake News! Reliability of News When Provided Title, Image, Source Bias & Full ArticleFrancesca Spezzano, Anu Shrestha, Jerry Alan Fails, Brian W. StoneCSCW 2021 · 22 citations
Related papers
- Understanding the Use of Images to Spread COVID-19 Misinformation on TwitterYuping Wang, Chen Ling, Gianluca StringhiniCSCW 2023 · 14 citations
- Mobilizing Manufactured Reality: How Participatory Disinformation Shaped Deep Stories to Catalyze Action during the 2020 U.S. Presidential ElectionStephen Prochaska, Kayla Duskin, Zarine Kharazian, Carly Minow et al.CSCW 2023 · 48 citations
- What is going on? An evidence-frame framework for analyzing online rumors about election integrityKate Starbird, Stephen Prochaska, Ben YamronCSCW 2025 · 7 citations
- The Impact of Twitter Labels on Misinformation Spread and User Engagement: Lessons from Trump's Election TweetsOrestis Papakyriakopoulos, Ellen P. GoodmannWWW 2022 · 53 citations
- Understanding Voter Fraud Misinformation Videos during the 2024 Taiwan Election on YouTubeYanheng Li, Da Wang, Yuping WangCSCW 2025 · 1 citation
