In Good GRACES: Principled Teacher Selection for Knowledge Distillation
Abhishek Panigrahi, Bingbin Liu, Sadhika Malladi, Sham M. Kakade, Surbhi Goel
Abstract
Knowledge distillation is an efficient strategy to use data generated by large “teacher” language models to train smaller capable “student” models, but selecting the optimal teacher for a specific student-task combination requires expensive trial-and-error. We propose a lightweight score called GRACE to quantify how effective a teacher will be for post-training a student model. GRACE measures distributional properties of the student’s gradients without access to a verifier, teacher logits, teacher internals, or test data. From an information-theoretic perspective, GRACE connects to leave-one-out stability of gradient-based algorithms, which controls the generalization performance of the distilled students. On GSM8K and MATH, GRACE correlates strongly (up to 86% Spearman correlation) with the performance of the distilled LLaMA and OLMo students. In particular, training a student using the GRACE-selected teacher can improve the performance by up to 7.4% over naively using the best-performing teacher. Further, GRACE can provide guidance on crucial design choices in distillation, including (1) the best temperature to use when generating from the teacher, (2) the best teacher to use given a size constraint, and (3) the best teacher to use within a specific model family. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that GRACE can efficiently and effectively identify a strongly compatible teacher for a given student and provide fine-grained guidance on how to perform distillation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8cb710d3-1a14-44d0-8ff9-9b4f3128b9a0Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on25
- Improved Knowledge Distillation via Teacher AssistantSeyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Ang Li, Nir Levine et al.AAAI 2020 · 1,361 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
- Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower BoundsJordan T. Ash, Chicheng Zhang, Akshay Krishnamurthy, John Langford et al.ICLR 2020 · 974 citations
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
Related papers
- SelecTKD: Selective Token-Weighted Knowledge Distillation for LLMsHaiduo Huang, Jiangcheng Song, Yadong Zhang, Pengju RenCVPR 2026 · 18 citations
- Tailoring Instructions to Student's Learning Levels Boosts Knowledge DistillationYuxin Ren, Zihan Zhong, Xingjian Shi, Yi Zhu et al.ACL 2023 · 7 citations
- Distillation of Large Language Models via Concrete Score MatchingYeongmin Kim, Donghyeok Shin, Mina Kang, Byeonghu Na et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Logit Standardization in Knowledge DistillationShangquan Sun, Wenqi Ren, Jingzhi Li, Rui Wang et al.CVPR 2024 · 183 citations
- Sparse Teachers Can Be Dense with KnowledgeYi Yang, Chen Zhang, Dawei SongEMNLP 2022 · 2 citations
