A Security Framework for Distributed Ledgers
Mike Graf, Daniel Rausch, Viktoria Ronge, Christoph Egger, Ralf Küsters, Dominique Schröder
Abstract
In the past few years blockchains have been a major focus for security research, resulting in significant progress in the design, formalization, and analysis of blockchain protocols. However, the more general class of distributed ledgers, which includes not just blockchains but also prominent non-blockchain protocols, such as Corda and OmniLedger, cannot be covered by the state-of-the-art in the security literature yet. These distributed ledgers often break with traditional blockchain paradigms, such as block structures to store data, system-wide consensus, or global consistency. In this paper, we close this gap by proposing the first framework for defining and analyzing the security of general distributed ledgers, with an ideal distributed ledger functionality, called Fledger, at the core of our contribution. This functionality covers not only classical blockchains but also non-blockchain distributed ledgers in a unified way. To illustrate Fledger, we first show that the prominent ideal block-chain functionalities Gledger and GPL realize (suitable instantiations of) Fledger, which captures their security properties. This implies that their respective implementations, including Bitcoin, Ouroboros Genesis, and Ouroboros Crypsinous, realize Fledger as well. Secondly, we demonstrate that Fledger is capable of precisely modeling also non-blockchain distributed ledgers by performing the first formal security analysis of such a distributed ledger, namely the prominent Corda protocol. Due to the wide spread use of Corda in industry, in particular the financial sector, this analysis is of independent interest. These results also illustrate that Fledger not just generalizes the modular treatment of blockchains to distributed ledgers, but moreover helps to unify existing results.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8c8b8c50-3d92-4ef8-a37c-c808d7d67b79Cited by top-tier papers2
- Embedding the UC Model into the IITM ModelDaniel Rausch, Ralf Küsters, Céline ChevalierEUROCRYPT 2022 · 3 citations
- AUC: Accountable Universal ComposabilityMike Graf, Ralf Küsters, Daniel RauschS&P 2023
Builds on9
- Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart ContractsAhmed E. Kosba, Andrew Miller, Elaine Shi, Zikai Wen et al.S&P 2016 · 2,201 citations
- A Secure Sharding Protocol For Open BlockchainsLoi Luu, Viswesh Narayanan, Chaodong Zheng, Kunal Baweja et al.CCS 2016 · 1,392 citations
- OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via ShardingEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly et al.S&P 2018 · 1,145 citations
- RapidChain: Scaling Blockchain via Full ShardingMahdi Zamani, Mahnush Movahedi, Mariana RaykovaCCS 2018 · 1,084 citations
- Ouroboros Genesis: Composable Proof-of-Stake Blockchains with Dynamic AvailabilityChristian Badertscher, Peter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell et al.CCS 2018 · 306 citations
Related papers
- Mneme: A Mobile Distributed LedgerDimitris Chatzopoulos, Sujit Gujar, Boi Faltings, Pan HuiINFOCOM 2020 · 11 citations
- Ouroboros Crypsinous: Privacy-Preserving Proof-of-StakeThomas Kerber, Aggelos Kiayias, Markulf Kohlweiss, Vassilis ZikasS&P 2019 · 82 citations
- Blockchains vs. Distributed Databases: Dichotomy and FusionPingcheng Ruan, Tien Tuan Anh Dinh, Dumitrel Loghin, Meihui Zhang et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 68 citations
- Lay Down the Common Metrics: Evaluating Proof-of-Work Consensus Protocols' SecurityRen Zhang, Bart PreneelS&P 2019 · 113 citations
- FireLedger: A High Throughput Blockchain Consensus ProtocolYehonatan Buchnik, Roy FriedmanVLDB 2020 · 19 citations
