SAFER: Development and Evaluation of an IoT Device Risk Assessment Framework in a Multinational Organization
Pascal Oser, Sebastian S. Feger, Pawel W. Wozniak, Jakob Karolus, Dayana Spagnuelo, Akash Gupta, Stefan Lüders, Albrecht Schmidt, Frank Kargl
Abstract
Users of Internet of Things (IoT) devices are often unaware of their security risks and cannot sufficiently factor security considerations into their device selection. This puts networks, infrastructure and users at risk. We developed and evaluated SAFER, an IoT device risk assessment framework designed to improve users' ability to assess the security of connected devices. We deployed SAFER in a large multinational organization that permits use of private devices. To evaluate the framework, we conducted a mixed-method study with 20 employees. Our findings suggest that SAFER increases users' awareness of security issues. It provides valuable advice and impacts device selection. Based on our findings, we discuss implications for the design of device risk assessment tools, with particular regard to the relationship between risk communication and user perceptions of device complexity.
CCS Concepts: • Security and privacy → Usability in security and privacy; • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; Ubiquitous and mobile computing systems and tools; Information visualization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8bee0c33-6b19-4f08-a1fd-299d0f76e88dCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on2
Related papers
- "You Just Assume It Is In There, I Guess": Understanding UK Families' Application and Knowledge of Smart Home Cyber SecuritySarah Turner, Nandita Pattnaik, Jason R. C. Nurse, Shujun LiCSCW 2022 · 16 citations
- Which Privacy and Security Attributes Most Impact Consumers' Risk Perception and Willingness to Purchase IoT Devices?Pardis Emami Naeini, Janarth Dheenadhayalan, Yuvraj Agarwal, Lorrie Faith CranorS&P 2021 · 80 citations
- Protected or Porous: A Comparative Analysis of Threat Detection Capability of IoT SafeguardsAnna Maria Mandalari, Hamed Haddadi, Daniel J. Dubois, David R. ChoffnesS&P 2023
- Are Consumers Willing to Pay for Security and Privacy of IoT Devices?Pardis Emami Naeini, Janarth Dheenadhayalan, Yuvraj Agarwal, Lorrie Faith CranorUSENIX Security 2023
- Beyond Clinical Risk: An Experimental Study of Cybersecurity Informed Consent and Patient Choice for Connected Medical DevicesRonald E. Thompson III, R. Harrison Sweet, Christian J. Dameff, Jeffrey L. Tully et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
