Which Privacy and Security Attributes Most Impact Consumers' Risk Perception and Willingness to Purchase IoT Devices?
Pardis Emami Naeini, Janarth Dheenadhayalan, Yuvraj Agarwal, Lorrie Faith Cranor
Abstract
In prior work, researchers proposed an Internet of Things (IoT) security and privacy label akin to a food nutrition label, based on input from experts. We conducted a survey with 1,371 Mechanical Turk (MTurk) participants to test the effectiveness of each of the privacy and security attribute-value pairs proposed in that prior work along two key dimensions: ability to convey risk to consumers and impact on their willingness to purchase an IoT device. We found that the values intended to communicate increased risk were generally perceived that way by participants. For example, we found that consumers perceived more risk when a label conveyed that data would be sold to third parties than when it would not be sold at all, and that consumers were more willing to purchase devices when they knew that their data would not be retained or shared with others. However, participants' risk perception did not always align with their willingness to purchase, sometimes due to usability concerns. Based on our fndings, we propose actionable recommendations on how to more effectively present privacy and security attributes on an IoT label to better communicate risk to consumers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3d976afc-6fa6-486b-9418-ae1f9a3c8e13Cited by top-tier papers16
- Unpacking Privacy Labels: A Measurement and Developer Perspective on Google's Data Safety SectionRishabh Khandelwal, Asmit Nayak, Paul Chung, Kassem FawazUSENIX Security 2024 · 34 citations
- Tangible Privacy for Smart Voice Assistants: Bystanders' Perceptions of Physical Device ControlsImtiaz Ahmad, Taslima Akter, Zachary Buher, Rosta Farzan et al.CSCW 2022 · 20 citations
- Understanding Parents' Perceptions and Practices Toward Children's Security and Privacy in Virtual RealityJiaxun Cao, Abhinaya S. B., Anupam Das, Pardis Emami NaeiniS&P 2024 · 19 citations
- Bring Privacy To The Table: Interactive Negotiation for Privacy Settings of Shared Sensing DevicesHaozhe Zhou, Mayank Goel, Yuvraj AgarwalCHI 2024 · 19 citations
- IoTFlow: Inferring IoT Device Behavior at Scale through Static Mobile Companion App AnalysisDavid Schmidt, Carlotta Tagliaro, Kevin Borgolte, Martina LindorferCCS 2023 · 13 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Are Consumers Willing to Pay for Security and Privacy of IoT Devices?Pardis Emami Naeini, Janarth Dheenadhayalan, Yuvraj Agarwal, Lorrie Faith CranorUSENIX Security 2023
- Is a Trustmark and QR Code Enough? The Effect of IoT Security and Privacy Label Information Complexity on Consumer Comprehension and BehaviorClaire C. Chen, Dillon Shu, Hamsini Ravishankar, Xinran Li et al.CHI 2024 · 27 citations
- Comparing the Use and Usefulness of Four IoT Security LabelsPeter J. Caven, Zitao Zhang, Jacob Abbott, Xinyao Ma et al.CHI 2024 · 15 citations
- Security Update Labels: Establishing Economic Incentives for Security Patching of IoT Consumer ProductsPhilipp Morgner, Christoph Mai, Nicole Koschate-Fischer, Felix C. Freiling et al.S&P 2020 · 41 citations
- Examining Consumer Reviews to Understand Security and Privacy Issues in the Market of Smart Home DevicesSwaathi Vetrivel, Veerle van Harten, Carlos Hernandez Gañán, Michel van Eeten et al.USENIX Security 2023
