MBR and QE Finetuning: Training-time Distillation of the Best and Most Expensive Decoding Methods
Mara Finkelstein, Markus Freitag
Abstract
Recent research in decoding methods for Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks has shown that MAP decoding is not optimal, because model probabilities do not always align with human preferences. Stronger decoding methods, including Quality Estimation (QE) reranking and Minimum Bayes' Risk (MBR) decoding, have since been proposed to mitigate the model-perplexity-vs-quality mismatch. While these decoding methods achieve state-of-the-art performance, they are prohibitively expensive to compute. In this work, we propose MBR finetuning and QE finetuning which distill the quality gains from these decoding methods at training time, while using an efficient decoding algorithm at inference time. Using the canonical NLG task of Neural Machine Translation (NMT), we show that even with self-training, these finetuning methods significantly outperform the base model. Moreover, when using an external LLM as a teacher model, these finetuning methods outperform finetuning on human-generated references. These findings suggest new ways to leverage monolingual data to achieve improvements in model quality that are on par with, or even exceed, improvements from human-curated data, while maintaining maximum efficiency during decoding.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8b320e11-32e9-4b5e-8279-9f1e82959c40Cited by top-tier papers8
- Efficient Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Low-Rank Matrix Completion AlgorithmsFiras Trabelsi, David Vilar, Mara Finkelstein, Markus FreitagNeurIPS 2024 · 18 citations
- Beyond Correlation: Interpretable Evaluation of Machine Translation MetricsStefano Perrella, Lorenzo Proietti, Pere-Lluís Huguet Cabot, Edoardo Barba et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Learning from others' mistakes: Finetuning machine translation models with span-level error annotationsLily H. Zhang, Hamid Dadkhahi, Mara Finkelstein, Firas Trabelsi et al.ICML 2025
- Don't Rank, Combine! Combining Machine Translation Hypotheses Using Quality EstimationGiorgos Vernikos, Andrei Popescu-BelisACL 2024
- Document-Level Text Generation with Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Optimal TransportYuu JinnaiACL 2025
Builds on1
Related papers
- Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single ModelChristian Tomani, David Vilar, Markus Freitag, Colin Cherry et al.ACL 2024
- Unveiling the Power of Source: Source-based Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Neural Machine TranslationBoxuan Lyu, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Kotaro Funakoshi, Manabu OkumuraACL 2025
- Better Instruction-Following Through Minimum Bayes RiskIan Wu, Patrick Fernandes, Amanda Bertsch, Seungone Kim et al.ICLR 2025
- PEAR: Pairwise Evaluation for Automatic Relative Scoring in Machine TranslationLorenzo Proietti, Roman Grundkiewicz, Matt PostACL 2026
- Model-Based Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Text GenerationYuu Jinnai, Tetsuro Morimura, Ukyo Honda, Kaito Ariu et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
