Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Model
Christian Tomani, David Vilar, Markus Freitag, Colin Cherry, Subhajit Naskar, Mara Finkelstein, Xavier Garcia, Daniel Cremers
Abstract
Maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) decoding is the most widely used decoding strategy for neural machine translation (NMT) models. The underlying assumption is that model probability correlates well with human judgment, with better translations getting assigned a higher score by the model. However, research has shown that this assumption does not always hold, and generation quality can be improved by decoding to optimize a utility function backed by a metric or quality-estimation signal, as is done by Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) or qualityaware decoding. The main disadvantage of these approaches is that they require an additional model to calculate the utility function during decoding, significantly increasing the computational cost. In this paper, we propose to make the NMT models themselves qualityaware by training them to estimate the quality of their own output. Using this approach for MBR decoding we can drastically reduce the size of the candidate list, resulting in a speedup of two-orders of magnitude. When applying our method to MAP decoding we obtain quality gains similar or even superior to quality reranking approaches, but with the efficiency of single pass decoding.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 73f49cc2-92d2-4f80-b4f7-bb23a85b942eCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text GenerationThibault Sellam, Dipanjan Das, Ankur P. ParikhACL 2020 · 40 citations
- Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation MetricsNitika Mathur, Timothy Baldwin, Trevor CohnACL 2020 · 14 citations
- BLEU might be Guilty but References are not InnocentMarkus Freitag, David Grangier, Isaac CaswellEMNLP 2020 · 13 citations
- Sampling-Based Approximations to Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Neural Machine TranslationBryan Eikema, Wilker AzizEMNLP 2022 · 10 citations
Related papers
- MBR and QE Finetuning: Training-time Distillation of the Best and Most Expensive Decoding MethodsMara Finkelstein, Markus FreitagICLR 2024 · 39 citations
- Unveiling the Power of Source: Source-based Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Neural Machine TranslationBoxuan Lyu, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Kotaro Funakoshi, Manabu OkumuraACL 2025
- PEAR: Pairwise Evaluation for Automatic Relative Scoring in Machine TranslationLorenzo Proietti, Roman Grundkiewicz, Matt PostACL 2026
- QUEST: Quality-Aware Metropolis-Hastings Sampling for Machine TranslationGonçalo Rui Alves Faria, Sweta Agrawal, António Farinhas, Ricardo Rei et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 23 citations
- Case-Based Decision-Theoretic Decoding with Quality MemoriesHiroyuki Deguchi, Masaaki NagataEMNLP 2025
