Temporally Consistent Factuality Probing for Large Language Models
Ashutosh Bajpai, Aaryan Goyal, Atif Anwer, Tanmoy Chakraborty
Abstract
The prolific use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as an alternate knowledge base requires them to be factually consistent, necessitating both correctness and consistency traits for paraphrased queries. Recently, significant attempts have been made to benchmark datasets and metrics to evaluate LLMs for these traits. However, structural simplicity (subject-relation-object) and contemporary association in their query formulation limit the broader definition of factuality and consistency. In this study, we introduce TeCFaP, a novel Temporally Consistent Factuality Probe task to expand the consistent factuality probe in the temporal dimension. To this end, we propose TEMP-COFAC, a high-quality dataset of prefixstyle English query paraphrases. Subsequently, we extend the definitions of existing metrics to represent consistent factuality across temporal dimension. We experiment with a diverse set of LLMs and find most of them performing poorly on TeCFaP. Next, we propose a novel solution CoTSeLF (Consistent-Time-Sensitive Learning Framework) combining multi-task instruction tuning (MT-IT) with consistent-time-sensitive reinforcement learning (CTSRL) to improve temporally consistent factuality in LLMs. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of CoTSeLF over several baselines. * We leverage GPT-4 to extend manually constructed initial set of base subject-relation pairs. * All of them are male with their ages ranging between 25-35 years.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8b06cdbe-bfc8-48cb-a556-c2797b5819caCited by top-tier papers3
- Multilingual LLMs Inherently Reward In-Language Time-Sensitive Semantic Alignment for Low-Resource LanguagesAshutosh Bajpai, Tanmoy ChakrabortyAAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- Temporal Referential Consistency: Do LLMs Favor Sequences Over Absolute Time References?Ashutosh Bajpai, Tanmoy ChakrabortyEMNLP 2025
- Beyond Timestamps: Bridging Forward and Backward Reasoning in Temporal Numerical and Relational UnderstandingXinying Qian, Ying Zhang, Xuhui Sui, Yu Zhao et al.ACL 2026
Builds on7
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
- StreamingQA: A Benchmark for Adaptation to New Knowledge over Time in Question Answering ModelsAdam Liska, Tomás Kociský, Elena Gribovskaya, Tayfun Terzi et al.ICML 2022 · 129 citations
- Towards Benchmarking and Improving the Temporal Reasoning Capability of Large Language ModelsQingyu Tan, Hwee Tou Ng, Lidong BingACL 2023 · 24 citations
- Factually Consistent Summarization via Reinforcement Learning with Textual Entailment FeedbackPaul Roit, Johan Ferret, Lior Shani, Roee Aharoni et al.ACL 2023 · 21 citations
Related papers
- When Silence Is Golden: Can LLMs Learn to Abstain in Temporal QA and Beyond?Xinyu Zhou, Chang Jin, Carsten Eickhoff, Zhijiang Guo et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- FACT: Mitigating Inconsistent Hallucinations in LLMs via Fact-Driven Alternating Code-Text TrainingXinxin You, Qixin Sun, Chenwei Yan, Xiao Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Test of Time: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Temporal ReasoningBahare Fatemi, Mehran Kazemi, Anton Tsitsulin, Karishma Malkan et al.ICLR 2025 · 2 citations
- On Measuring Faithfulness or Self-consistency of Natural Language ExplanationsLetitia Parcalabescu, Anette FrankACL 2024
- OntoFact: Unveiling Fantastic Fact-Skeleton of LLMs via Ontology-Driven Reinforcement LearningZiyu Shang, Wenjun Ke, Nana Xiu, Peng Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 12 citations
