Temporal Referential Consistency: Do LLMs Favor Sequences Over Absolute Time References?
Ashutosh Bajpai, Tanmoy Chakraborty
Abstract
The increasing acceptance of large language models (LLMs) as an alternative to knowledge sources marks a significant paradigm shift across various domains, including time-sensitive fields such as law, healthcare, and finance. To fulfill this expanded role, LLMs must not only be factually accurate but also demonstrate consistency across temporal dimensions, necessitating robust temporal reasoning capabilities. Despite this critical requirement, efforts to ensure temporal consistency in LLMs remain scarce including noticeable absence of endeavors aimed at evaluating or augmenting LLMs across temporal references in time-sensitive inquiries. In this paper, we seek to address this gap by introducing a novel benchmark entitled temporal referential consistency, accompanied by a resource TEMP-ReCon designed to benchmark a wide range of both open-source and closed-source LLMs with various linguistic contexts characterized by differing resource richness (including English, French, and Romanian). The findings emphasis that LLMs do exhibit insufficient temporal referent consistency. To address this, we propose , a reasoning path alignment-based model that aims to enhance the temporal referential consistency of LLMs. Our empirical experiments substantiate the efficacy of UnTRaP compared to several baseline models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 37975595-6a68-4806-b320-9ae435c8bedaBuilds on14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Crosslingual Generalization through Multitask FinetuningNiklas Muennighoff, Thomas Wang, Lintang Sutawika, Adam Roberts et al.ACL 2023 · 319 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Timestamps: Bridging Forward and Backward Reasoning in Temporal Numerical and Relational UnderstandingXinying Qian, Ying Zhang, Xuhui Sui, Yu Zhao et al.ACL 2026
- Unveiling the Tapestry of Consistency in Large Vision-Language ModelsYuan Zhang, Fei Xiao, Tao Huang, Chun-Kai Fan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 27 citations
- Harnessing Temporal Databases for Systematic Evaluation of Factual Time-Sensitive Question-Answering in LLMsSoyeon Kim, Jindong Wang, Xing Xie, Steven Euijong WhangICLR 2026
- Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language ModelsRaghav Jain, Daivik Sojitra, Arkadeep Acharya, Sriparna Saha et al.EMNLP 2023 · 17 citations
- TimeBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Temporal Reasoning Abilities in Large Language ModelsZheng Chu, Jingchang Chen, Qianglong Chen, Weijiang Yu et al.ACL 2024 · 12 citations
