InkSight: Leveraging Sketch Interaction for Documenting Chart Findings in Computational Notebooks
Yanna Lin, Haotian Li, Leni Yang, Aoyu Wu, Huamin Qu
Abstract
This figure illustrates the process of using InkSight to document findings in a computational notebook. (A) displays the chart created by the user for data analysis. (B) demonstrates that when the user sketches atop the chart to identify areas of interest, InkSight automatically generates corresponding documentation on the right. (C) reveals how users can add more sketches and refine the documentations by performing interactions such as deleting, ordering, grouping, and editing. Abstract-Computational notebooks have become increasingly popular for exploratory data analysis due to their ability to support data exploration and explanation within a single document. Effective documentation for explaining chart findings during the exploration process is essential as it helps recall and share data analysis. However, documenting chart findings remains a challenge due to its time-consuming and tedious nature. While existing automatic methods alleviate some of the burden on users, they often fail to cater to users' specific interests. In response to these limitations, we present InkSight, a mixed-initiative computational notebook plugin that generates finding documentation based on the user's intent. InkSight allows users to express their intent in specific data subsets through sketching atop visualizations intuitively. To facilitate this, we designed two types of sketches, i.e., open-path and closed-path sketch. Upon receiving a user's sketch, InkSight identifies the sketch type and corresponding selected data items. Subsequently, it filters data fact types based on the sketch and selected data items before employing existing automatic data fact recommendation algorithms to infer data facts. Using large language models (GPT-3.5), InkSight converts data facts into effective natural language documentation. Users can conveniently fine-tune the generated documentation within InkSight. A user study with 12 participants demonstrated the usability and effectiveness of InkSight in expressing user intent and facilitating chart finding documentation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8aed60e8-b811-42ff-bb1a-dd7f2ab39836Cited by top-tier papers12
- Where Are We So Far? Understanding Data Storytelling Tools from the Perspective of Human-AI CollaborationHaotian Li, Yun Wang, Huamin QuCHI 2024 · 71 citations
- OutlineSpark: Igniting AI-powered Presentation Slides Creation from Computational Notebooks through OutlinesFengjie Wang, Yanna Lin, Leni Yang, Haotian Li et al.CHI 2024 · 19 citations
- NotePlayer: Engaging Computational Notebooks for Dynamic Presentation of Analytical ProcessesYang Ouyang, Leixian Shen, Yun Wang, Quan LiUIST 2024 · 11 citations
- Jupybara: Operationalizing a Design Space for Actionable Data Analysis and Storytelling with LLMsHuichen Will Wang, Larry Birnbaum, Vidya SetlurCHI 2025 · 11 citations
- InterLink: Linking Text with Code and Output in Computational NotebooksYanna Lin, Leni Yang, Haotian Li, Huamin Qu et al.CHI 2025 · 10 citations
Builds on19
- NL4DV: A Toolkit for Generating Analytic Specifications for Data Visualization from Natural Language QueriesArpit Narechania, Arjun Srinivasan, John T. StaskoIEEE VIS 2020 · 210 citations
- TaleBrush: Sketching Stories with Generative Pretrained Language ModelsJohn Joon Young Chung, Wooseok Kim, Kang Min Yoo, Hwaran Lee et al.CHI 2022 · 202 citations
- Calliope: Automatic Visual Data Story Generation from a SpreadsheetDanqing Shi, Xinyue Xu, Fuling Sun, Yang Shi et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 179 citations
- What's Wrong with Computational Notebooks? Pain Points, Needs, and Design OpportunitiesSouti Chattopadhyay, Ishita Prasad, Austin Z. Henley, Anita Sarma et al.CHI 2020 · 162 citations
- A Design Space for Applying the Freytag's Pyramid Structure to Data StoriesLeni Yang, Xian Xu, Xingyu Lan, Ziyan Liu et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 77 citations
Related papers
- Notable: On-the-fly Assistant for Data Storytelling in Computational NotebooksHaotian Li, Lu Ying, Haidong Zhang, Yingcai Wu et al.CHI 2023 · 38 citations
- NoteFlow: Leveraging Charts as Sight Glasses for Consistent and Continuous Data Flow TracingYuan Tian, Dazhen Deng, Sen Yang, Huawei Zheng et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- B2: Bridging Code and Interactive Visualization in Computational NotebooksYifan Wu, Joseph M. Hellerstein, Arvind SatyanarayanUIST 2020 · 71 citations
- ToonNote: Improving Communication in Computational Notebooks Using Interactive Data ComicsDaye Kang, Tony Ho, Nicolai Marquardt, Bilge Mutlu et al.CHI 2021 · 42 citations
- Code Code Evolution: Understanding How People Change Data Science Notebooks Over TimeDeepthi Raghunandan, Aayushi Roy, Shenzhi Shi, Niklas Elmqvist et al.CHI 2023 · 19 citations
