AUGER: automatically generating review comments with pre-training models
Lingwei Li, Li Yang, Huaxi Jiang, Jun Yan, Tiejian Luo, Zihan Hua, Geng Liang, Chun Zuo
Abstract
Code review is one of the best practices as a powerful safeguard for software quality. In practice, senior or highly skilled reviewers inspect source code and provide constructive comments, consider- ing what authors may ignore, for example, some special cases. The collaborative validation between contributors results in code being highly qualified and less chance of bugs. However, since personal knowledge is limited and varies, the efficiency and effectiveness of code review practice are worthy of further improvement. In fact, it still takes a colossal and time-consuming effort to deliver useful review comments. This paper explores a synergy of multiple practical review comments to enhance code review and proposes AUGER (AUtomatically GEnerating Review comments): a review comments generator with pre-training models. We first collect empirical review data from 11 notable Java projects and construct a dataset of 10,882 code changes. By leveraging Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer (T5) models, the framework synthesizes valuable knowledge in the training stage and effectively outperforms baselines by 37.38% in ROUGE-L. 29% of our automatic review comments are considered useful according to prior studies. The inference generates just in 20 seconds and is also open to training further. Moreover, the performance also gets improved when thoroughly analyzed in case study.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8a1c4284-b667-4e63-89f2-4b6cb6cac4bfCited by top-tier papers9
- Retrieval-Based Prompt Selection for Code-Related Few-Shot LearningNoor Nashid, Mifta Sintaha, Ali MesbahICSE 2023 · 156 citations
- Large Language Models are Few-Shot Summarizers: Multi-Intent Comment Generation via In-Context LearningMingyang Geng, Shangwen Wang, Dezun Dong, Haotian Wang et al.ICSE 2024 · 124 citations
- DivLog: Log Parsing with Prompt Enhanced In-Context LearningJunjielong Xu, Ruichun Yang, Yintong Huo, Chengyu Zhang et al.ICSE 2024 · 54 citations
- CORE: Resolving Code Quality Issues using LLMsNalin Wadhwa, Jui Pradhan, Atharv Sonwane, Surya Prakash Sahu et al.FSE 2024 · 32 citations
- Towards AI-Assisted Synthesis of Verified Dafny MethodsMd Rakib Hossain Misu, Cristina V. Lopes, Iris Ma, James NobleFSE 2024 · 26 citations
Builds on9
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- GraphCodeBERT: Pre-training Code Representations with Data FlowDaya Guo, Shuo Ren, Shuai Lu, Zhangyin Feng et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,644 citations
- Using Pre-Trained Models to Boost Code Review AutomationRosalia Tufano, Simone Masiero, Antonio Mastropaolo, Luca Pascarella et al.ICSE 2022 · 149 citations
- Using Deep Learning to Generate Complete Log StatementsAntonio Mastropaolo, Luca Pascarella, Gabriele BavotaICSE 2022 · 60 citations
- Fast Changeset-based Bug Localization with BERTAgnieszka Ciborowska, Kostadin DamevskiICSE 2022 · 53 citations
Related papers
- LAURA: Enhancing Code Review Generation with Context-Enriched Retrieval-Augmented LLMYuxin Zhang, Yuxia Zhang, Zeyu Sun, Yanjie Jiang et al.ASE 2025 · 8 citations
- Automating code review activities by large-scale pre-trainingZhiyu Li, Shuai Lu, Daya Guo, Nan Duan et al.FSE 2022 · 195 citations
- CommentFinder: a simpler, faster, more accurate code review comments recommendationYang Hong, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Patanamon Thongtanunam, Aldeida AletiFSE 2022 · 57 citations
- Studying the Usage of Text-To-Text Transfer Transformer to Support Code-Related TasksAntonio Mastropaolo, Simone Scalabrino, Nathan Cooper, David Nader-Palacio et al.ICSE 2021 · 9 citations
- Towards Automating Code Review ActivitiesRosalia Tufano, Luca Pascarella, Michele Tufano, Denys Poshyvanyk et al.ICSE 2021 · 4 citations
