CommentFinder: a simpler, faster, more accurate code review comments recommendation
Yang Hong, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Patanamon Thongtanunam, Aldeida Aleti
Abstract
Code review is an effective quality assurance practice, but can be labor-intensive since developers have to manually review the code and provide written feedback. Recently, a Deep Learning (DL)-based approach was introduced to automatically recommend code review comments based on changed methods. While the approach showed promising results, it requires expensive computational resource and time which limits its use in practice. To address this limitation, we propose CommentFinder – a retrieval-based approach to recommend code review comments. Through an empirical evaluation of 151,019 changed methods, we evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CommentFinder against the state-of-the-art approach. We find that when recommending the best-1 review comment candidate, our CommentFinder is 32% better than prior work in recommending the correct code review comment. In addition, CommentFinder is 49 times faster than the prior work. These findings highlight that our CommentFinder could help reviewers to reduce the manual efforts by recommending code review comments, while requiring less computational time.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- CORE: Resolving Code Quality Issues using LLMsNalin Wadhwa, Jui Pradhan, Atharv Sonwane, Surya Prakash Sahu et al.FSE 2024 · 32 citations
- Explaining Software Bugs Leveraging Code Structures in Neural Machine TranslationParvez Mahbub, Ohiduzzaman Shuvo, Mohammad Masudur RahmanICSE 2023 · 22 citations
- LAURA: Enhancing Code Review Generation with Context-Enriched Retrieval-Augmented LLMYuxin Zhang, Yuxia Zhang, Zeyu Sun, Yanjie Jiang et al.ASE 2025 · 8 citations
- Intention is All you Need: Refining your Code from your IntentionQi Guo, Xiaofei Xie, Shangqing Liu, Ming Hu et al.ICSE 2025 · 7 citations
- An Empirical Study on Code Review Activity Prediction and Its Impact in PracticeDoriane Olewicki, Sarra Habchi, Bram AdamsFSE 2024 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Towards Automating Code Review ActivitiesRosalia Tufano, Luca Pascarella, Michele Tufano, Denys Poshyvanyk et al.ICSE 2021 · 4 citations
- Using Pre-Trained Models to Boost Code Review AutomationRosalia Tufano, Simone Masiero, Antonio Mastropaolo, Luca Pascarella et al.ICSE 2022 · 149 citations
- AUGER: automatically generating review comments with pre-training modelsLingwei Li, Li Yang, Huaxi Jiang, Jun Yan et al.FSE 2022 · 56 citations
- CORMS: a GitHub and Gerrit based hybrid code reviewer recommendation approach for modern code reviewPrahar Pandya, Saurabh TiwariFSE 2022 · 21 citations
- Automating code review activities by large-scale pre-trainingZhiyu Li, Shuai Lu, Daya Guo, Nan Duan et al.FSE 2022 · 195 citations
