SimpleToM: Exposing the Gap between Explicit ToM Inference and Implicit ToM Application in LLMs
Yuling Gu, Oyvind Tafjord, Hyunwoo Kim, Jared Moore, Ronan Le Bras, Peter Clark, Yejin Choi
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly tested for a "Theory of Mind" (ToM) — the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and others. Yet most evaluations stop at explicit belief attribution in classical toy stories or stylized tasks, leaving open the questions of whether LLMs can implicitly apply such knowledge to predict human behavior, or to judge an observed behavior, in diverse scenarios. We introduce SimpleToM, a benchmark that advances ToM evaluation along two novel axes. First, it probes multiple levels of ToM reasoning, from mental state inference (explicit ToM) to behavior prediction and judgment (applied ToM). Second, it situates these tasks in diverse, everyday scenarios — such as supermarkets, hospitals, schools, and offices — where information asymmetries naturally arise (e.g., hidden defects in grocery store items, incomplete information in provider–patient interactions, or restricted access to locked devices). SimpleToM contains concise stories (e.g., "The can of Pringles has moldy chips in it. Mary picks up the can in the supermarket and walks to the cashier."), each with three questions that test different degrees of ToM reasoning, asking models to predict: (a) mental states ("Is Mary aware of the mold?"), (b) behaviors ("Will Mary pay for the chips or report the mold?"), and (c) judgments ("Mary paid for the chips. Was that reasonable?"). Experiments reveal a striking gap: state-of-the-art models often reliably infer mental state (a), but fail at applying knowledge about the mental state for secondary predictions, with performance dropping sharply for behavior prediction (b) and further for behavior judgment (c). This exposes a critical fragility in LLMs’ social reasoning in terms of what they know (explicit ToM) versus how well they can implicitly apply that knowledge for predictions (applied ToM). By uniting assessment of different levels of ToM reasoning with diverse, everyday scenarios, SimpleToM opens new opportunities for rigorously evaluating and diagnosing ToM abilities in LLMs, and reveals surprising, new insights about current model capabilities, guiding efforts toward future generations of models capable of robust social understanding.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 895fc6ac-4650-44e4-b74d-988b4dde7152Cited by top-tier papers12
- MetaMind: Modeling Human Social Thoughts with Metacognitive Multi-Agent SystemsXuanming Zhang, Yuxuan Chen, Samuel (Min-Hsuan) Yeh, Sharon LiNeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- TreeSynth: Synthesizing Diverse Data from Scratch via Tree-Guided Subspace PartitioningSheng Wang, Pengan Chen, Jingqi Zhou, Qintong Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- From Stimuli to Minds: Enhancing Psychological Reasoning in LLMs via Bilateral Reinforcement LearningYichao Feng, Haoran Luo, Lang Feng, Shuai Zhao et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Language Statistics and False Belief Reasoning: Evidence from 41 Open-Weight LMsSean Trott, Samuel M. Taylor, Cameron Robert Jones, James A. Michaelov et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Playpen: An Environment for Exploring Learning From Dialogue Game FeedbackNicola Horst, Davide Mazzaccara, Antonia Schmidt, Michael Sullivan et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on15
- The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem ComplexityParshin Shojaee, Iman Mirzadeh, Keivan Alizadeh-Vahid, Maxwell Horton et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 507 citations
- Neural Theory-of-Mind? On the Limits of Social Intelligence in Large LMsMaarten Sap, Ronan Le Bras, Daniel Fried, Yejin ChoiEMNLP 2022 · 92 citations
- SODA: Million-scale Dialogue Distillation with Social Commonsense ContextualizationHyunwoo Kim, Jack Hessel, Liwei Jiang, Peter West et al.EMNLP 2023 · 60 citations
- Minding Language Models' (Lack of) Theory of Mind: A Plug-and-Play Multi-Character Belief TrackerMelanie Sclar, Sachin Kumar, Peter West, Alane Suhr et al.ACL 2023 · 21 citations
- FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in InteractionsHyunwoo Kim, Melanie Sclar, Xuhui Zhou, Ronan Le Bras et al.EMNLP 2023 · 21 citations
Related papers
- RecToM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Machine Theory of Mind in LLM-based Conversational Recommender SystemsMengfan Li, Xuanhua Shi, Yang DengAAAI 2026
- Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Assessment and EnhancementRuirui Chen, Weifeng Jiang, Chengwei Qin, Cheston TanACL 2025
- Perceptions to Beliefs: Exploring Precursory Inferences for Theory of Mind in Large Language ModelsChani Jung, Dongkwan Kim, Jiho Jin, Jiseon Kim et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- ToMBench: Benchmarking Theory of Mind in Large Language ModelsZhuang Chen, Jincenzi Wu, Jinfeng Zhou, Bosi Wen et al.ACL 2024 · 6 citations
- MovieGraph-ToM: Evaluating Long-Range Theory of Mind in Large Language Models via Implicit Social-Causal GraphsTingjiang Wei, Qin Ni, Rong Gao, Yingying Wang et al.AAAI 2026
