MetaMind: Modeling Human Social Thoughts with Metacognitive Multi-Agent Systems
Xuanming Zhang, Yuxuan Chen, Samuel (Min-Hsuan) Yeh, Sharon Li
Abstract
Human social interactions depend on the ability to infer others'unspoken intentions, emotions, and beliefs-a cognitive skill grounded in the psychological concept of Theory of Mind (ToM). While large language models (LLMs) excel in semantic understanding tasks, they struggle with the ambiguity and contextual nuance inherent in human communication. To bridge this gap, we introduce MetaMind, a multi-agent framework inspired by psychological theories of metacognition, designed to emulate human-like social reasoning. MetaMind decomposes social understanding into three collaborative stages: (1) a Theory-of-Mind Agent generates hypotheses about user mental states (e.g., intent, emotion), (2) a Moral Agent refines these hypotheses using cultural norms and ethical constraints, and (3) a Response Agent generates contextually appropriate responses while validating alignment with inferred intent. Our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance across three challenging benchmarks, with 35.7% improvement in real-world social scenarios and 6.2% gain in ToM reasoning. Notably, it enables LLMs to match human-level performance on key ToM tasks for the first time. Ablation studies confirm the necessity of all components, which showcase the framework's ability to balance contextual plausibility, social appropriateness, and user adaptation. This work advances AI systems toward human-like social intelligence, with applications in empathetic dialogue and culturally sensitive interactions. Code is available at https://github.com/XMZhangAI/MetaMind.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 68726257-19d3-45cd-9aae-6f2496f478acCited by top-tier papers2
- General Exploratory Bonus for Optimistic Exploration in RLHFWendi Li, Changdae Oh, Sharon LiICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Tracing Belief-Driven Thoughts with Theory-of-Mind Agents: An Opinion Analysis FrameworkJintao Wen, Yunfeng Ning, Hankun Kang, Xin Miao et al.WWW 2026
Builds on24
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model SocietyGuohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,975 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
Related papers
- Consensus-Driven Multi-Agent Cognitive Reasoning for Enhancing the Emotional Intelligence of Large Language ModelsGeng Tu, Dingming Li, Jun Huang, Ruifeng XuAAAI 2026
- Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Assessment and EnhancementRuirui Chen, Weifeng Jiang, Chengwei Qin, Cheston TanACL 2025
- ToMBench: Benchmarking Theory of Mind in Large Language ModelsZhuang Chen, Jincenzi Wu, Jinfeng Zhou, Bosi Wen et al.ACL 2024 · 6 citations
- AutoToM: Scaling Model-based Mental Inference via Automated Agent ModelingZhining Zhang, Chuanyang Jin, Mung Yao Jia, Shunchi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 30 citations
- The Decrypto Benchmark for Multi-Agent Reasoning and Theory of MindAndrei Lupu, Timon Willi, Jakob FoersterICML 2026 · 2 citations
