Unlabeled Imperfect Demonstrations in Adversarial Imitation Learning
Yunke Wang, Bo Du, Chang Xu
Abstract
Adversarial imitation learning has become a widely used imitation learning framework. The discriminator is often trained by taking expert demonstrations and policy trajectories as examples respectively from two categories (positive vs. negative) and the policy is then expected to produce trajectories that are indistinguishable from the expert demonstrations. But in the real world, the collected expert demonstrations are more likely to be imperfect, where only an unknown fraction of the demonstrations are optimal. Instead of treating imperfect expert demonstrations as absolutely positive or negative, we investigate unlabeled imperfect expert demonstrations as they are. A positive-unlabeled adversarial imitation learning algorithm is developed to dynamically sample expert demonstrations that can well match the trajectories from the constantly optimized agent policy. The trajectories of an initial agent policy could be closer to those non-optimal expert demonstrations, but within the framework of adversarial imitation learning, agent policy will be optimized to cheat the discriminator and produce trajectories that are similar to those optimal expert demonstrations. Theoretical analysis shows that our method learns from the imperfect demonstrations via a self-paced way. Experimental results on MuJoCo and Robo-Suite platforms demonstrate the effectiveness of our method from different aspects.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8921b503-df14-422e-91ae-c6bdf6c6e4c9Cited by top-tier papers4
- Distributional Pareto-Optimal Multi-Objective Reinforcement LearningXin-Qiang Cai, Pushi Zhang, Li Zhao, Jiang Bian et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 46 citations
- Imitation Learning from Vague FeedbackXin-Qiang Cai, Yu-Jie Zhang, Chao-Kai Chiang, Masashi SugiyamaNeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
- Imitation Learning from Purified DemonstrationsYunke Wang, Minjing Dong, Yukun Zhao, Bo Du et al.ICML 2024 · 2 citations
- PN-GAIL: Leveraging Non-optimal Information from Imperfect DemonstrationsQiang Liu, Huiqiao Fu, Kaiqiang Tang, Chunlin Chen et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on13
- DouZero: Mastering DouDizhu with Self-Play Deep Reinforcement LearningDaochen Zha, Jingru Xie, Wenye Ma, Sheng Zhang et al.ICML 2021 · 150 citations
- Error Bounds of Imitating Policies and EnvironmentsTian Xu, Ziniu Li, Yang YuNeurIPS 2020 · 141 citations
- Disagreement-Regularized Imitation LearningKianté Brantley, Wen Sun, Mikael HenaffICLR 2020 · 112 citations
- DemoDICE: Offline Imitation Learning with Supplementary Imperfect DemonstrationsGeon-Hyeong Kim, Seokin Seo, Jongmin Lee, Wonseok Jeon et al.ICLR 2022 · 111 citations
- What Matters for Adversarial Imitation Learning?Manu Orsini, Anton Raichuk, Léonard Hussenot, Damien Vincent et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 106 citations
Related papers
- Learning to Weight Imperfect DemonstrationsYunke Wang, Chang Xu, Bo Du, Honglak LeeICML 2021 · 57 citations
- Adversarial Imitation Learning with PreferencesAleksandar Taranovic, Andras Gabor Kupcsik, Niklas Freymuth, Gerhard NeumannICLR 2023 · 25 citations
- Adversarial Soft Advantage Fitting: Imitation Learning without Policy OptimizationPaul Barde, Julien Roy, Wonseok Jeon, Joelle Pineau et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 30 citations
- Limited Preference Aided Imitation Learning from Imperfect DemonstrationsXingchen Cao, Fan-Ming Luo, Junyin Ye, Tian Xu et al.ICML 2024 · 6 citations
- State-only Imitation with Transition Dynamics MismatchTanmay Gangwani, Jian PengICLR 2020 · 56 citations
