Adversarial Imitation Learning with Preferences
Aleksandar Taranovic, Andras Gabor Kupcsik, Niklas Freymuth, Gerhard Neumann
Abstract
Designing an accurate and explainable reward function for many Reinforcement Learning tasks is a cumbersome and tedious process. Instead, learning policies directly from the feedback of human teachers naturally integrates human domain knowledge into the policy optimization process. Different feedback modalities, such as demonstrations and preferences, provide distinct benefits and disadvantages. For example, demonstrations convey a lot of information about the task but are often hard or costly to obtain from real experts while preferences typically contain less information but are in most cases cheap to generate. However, existing methods centered around human feedback mostly focus on a single teaching modality, causing them to miss out on important training data while making them less intuitive to use. In this paper we propose a novel method for policy learning that incorporates two different feedback types, namely demonstrations and preferences. To this end, we make use of the connection between discriminator training and density ratio estimation to incorporate preferences into the popular Adversarial Imitation Learning paradigm. This insight allows us to express loss functions over both demonstrations and preferences in a unified framework. Besides expert demonstrations, we are also able to learn from imperfect ones and combine them with preferences to achieve improved task performance. We experimentally validate the effectiveness of combining both preferences and demonstrations on common benchmarks and also show that our method can efficiently learn challenging robot manipulation tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4612666f-1f17-4c95-b667-1494e970a408Cited by top-tier papers5
- Coherent Soft Imitation LearningJoe Watson, Sandy H. Huang, Nicolas HeessNeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- Contextual Bandits and Imitation Learning with Preference-Based Active QueriesAyush Sekhari, Karthik Sridharan, Wen Sun, Runzhe WuNeurIPS 2023 · 18 citations
- Limited Preference Aided Imitation Learning from Imperfect DemonstrationsXingchen Cao, Fan-Ming Luo, Junyin Ye, Tian Xu et al.ICML 2024 · 6 citations
- PAWS: Preference Learning with Advantage-Weighted SegmentsAleksandar Taranovic, Onur Celik, Niklas Freymuth, Ge Li et al.ICML 2026
- PN-GAIL: Leveraging Non-optimal Information from Imperfect DemonstrationsQiang Liu, Huiqiao Fu, Kaiqiang Tang, Chunlin Chen et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on6
- Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical PrecipiceRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,067 citations
- PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingKimin Lee, Laura M. Smith, Pieter AbbeelICML 2021 · 380 citations
- Reward-rational (implicit) choice: A unifying formalism for reward learningHong Jun Jeon, Smitha Milli, Anca D. DraganNeurIPS 2020 · 219 citations
- What Matters for Adversarial Imitation Learning?Manu Orsini, Anton Raichuk, Léonard Hussenot, Damien Vincent et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 106 citations
- On-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Average-Reward CriterionYiming Zhang, Keith W. RossICML 2021 · 59 citations
Related papers
- Learning to Weight Imperfect DemonstrationsYunke Wang, Chang Xu, Bo Du, Honglak LeeICML 2021 · 57 citations
- Imitation Learning from Vague FeedbackXin-Qiang Cai, Yu-Jie Zhang, Chao-Kai Chiang, Masashi SugiyamaNeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
- Unlabeled Imperfect Demonstrations in Adversarial Imitation LearningYunke Wang, Bo Du, Chang XuAAAI 2023 · 11 citations
- Improving Reward Model Generalization from Adversarial Process Enhanced PreferencesZhilong Zhang, Tian Xu, Xinghao Du, Xingchen Cao et al.ICML 2025
- Learning Efficient Dialogue Policy from Demonstrations through ShapingHuimin Wang, Baolin Peng, Kam-Fai WongACL 2020 · 18 citations
