Effective Robustness against Natural Distribution Shifts for Models with Different Training Data
Zhouxing Shi, Nicholas Carlini, Ananth Balashankar, Ludwig Schmidt, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Alex Beutel, Yao Qin
Abstract
Effective robustness" measures the extra out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness beyond what can be predicted from the in-distribution (ID) performance. Existing effective robustness evaluations typically use a single test set such as ImageNet to evaluate the ID accuracy. This becomes problematic when evaluating models trained on different data distributions, e.g., comparing models trained on ImageNet vs. zero-shot language-image pre-trained models trained on LAION. In this paper, we propose a new evaluation metric to evaluate and compare the effective robustness of models trained on different data. To do this, we control for the accuracy on multiple ID test sets that cover the training distributions for all the evaluated models. Our new evaluation metric provides a better estimate of effective robustness when there are models with different training data. It may also explain the surprising effective robustness gains of zero-shot CLIP-like models exhibited in prior works that used ImageNet as the only ID test set, while the gains diminish under our new evaluation. Additional artifacts including interactive visualizations are provided at https://shizhouxing.github.io/effective-robustness .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- A Sober Look at the Robustness of CLIPs to Spurious FeaturesQizhou Wang, Yong Lin, Yongqiang Chen, Ludwig Schmidt et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 46 citations
- LCA-on-the-Line: Benchmarking Out of Distribution Generalization with Class TaxonomiesJia Shi, Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare, Jinjin Tian, Siqi Chai et al.ICML 2024 · 13 citations
- Visual Data-Type Understanding does not emerge from scaling Vision-Language ModelsVishaal Udandarao, Max F. Burg, Samuel Albanie, Matthias BethgeICLR 2024 · 11 citations
- Does Progress On Object Recognition Benchmarks Improve Generalization on Crowdsourced, Global Data?Megan Richards, Polina Kirichenko, Diane Bouchacourt, Mark IbrahimICLR 2024 · 2 citations
Builds on22
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text SupervisionChao Jia, Yinfei Yang, Ye Xia, Yi-Ting Chen et al.ICML 2021 · 5,401 citations
- Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised LearnersTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Kevin Swersky, Mohammad Norouzi et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,611 citations
Related papers
- Models Out of Line: A Fourier Lens on Distribution Shift RobustnessSara Fridovich-Keil, Brian R. Bartoldson, James Diffenderfer, Bhavya Kailkhura et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2 citations
- Quality Not Quantity: On the Interaction between Dataset Design and Robustness of CLIPThao Nguyen, Gabriel Ilharco, Mitchell Wortsman, Sewoong Oh et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 131 citations
- Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelsMitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Jong Wook Kim, Mike Li et al.CVPR 2022 · 364 citations
- Does CLIP's generalization performance mainly stem from high train-test similarity?Prasanna Mayilvahanan, Thaddäus Wiedemer, Evgenia Rusak, Matthias Bethge et al.ICLR 2024 · 43 citations
- Data Determines Distributional Robustness in Contrastive Language Image Pre-training (CLIP)Alex Fang, Gabriel Ilharco, Mitchell Wortsman, Yuhao Wan et al.ICML 2022 · 183 citations
