Models Out of Line: A Fourier Lens on Distribution Shift Robustness
Sara Fridovich-Keil, Brian R. Bartoldson, James Diffenderfer, Bhavya Kailkhura, Timo Bremer
Abstract
Improving the accuracy of deep neural networks (DNNs) on out-of-distribution (OOD) data is critical to an acceptance of deep learning (DL) in real world applications. It has been observed that accuracies on in-distribution (ID) versus OOD data follow a linear trend and models that outperform this baseline are exceptionally rare (and referred to as "effectively robust"). Recently, some promising approaches have been developed to improve OOD robustness: model pruning, data augmentation, and ensembling or zero-shot evaluating large pretrained models. However, there still is no clear understanding of the conditions on OOD data and model properties that are required to observe effective robustness. We approach this issue by conducting a comprehensive empirical study of diverse approaches that are known to impact OOD robustness on a broad range of natural and synthetic distribution shifts of CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. In particular, we view the "effective robustness puzzle" through a Fourier lens and ask how spectral properties of both models and OOD data influence the corresponding effective robustness. We find this Fourier lens offers some insight into why certain robust models, particularly those from the CLIP family, achieve OOD robustness. However, our analysis also makes clear that no known metric is consistently the best explanation (or even a strong explanation) of OOD robustness. Thus, to aid future research into the OOD puzzle, we address the gap in publicly-available models with effective robustness by introducing a set of pretrained models-RobustNets-with varying levels of OOD robustness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3b6a11d9-ac7a-4b49-a26b-8e5abf149fa2Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and UncertaintyDan Hendrycks, Norman Mu, Ekin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,572 citations
- Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find ThemYiding Jiang, Behnam Neyshabur, Hossein Mobahi, Dilip Krishnan et al.ICLR 2020 · 705 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
- Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelsMitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Jong Wook Kim, Mike Li et al.CVPR 2022 · 364 citations
Related papers
- Effective Robustness against Natural Distribution Shifts for Models with Different Training DataZhouxing Shi, Nicholas Carlini, Ananth Balashankar, Ludwig Schmidt et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution DetectionStanislav Fort, Jie Ren, Balaji LakshminarayananNeurIPS 2021 · 443 citations
- Out-of-Distribution Detection with Relative AnglesBerker Demirel, Marco Fumero, Francesco LocatelloNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Robust Fine-tuning of Zero-shot Models via Variance ReductionBeier Zhu, Jiequan Cui, Hanwang ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- A Winning Hand: Compressing Deep Networks Can Improve Out-of-Distribution RobustnessJames Diffenderfer, Brian R. Bartoldson, Shreya Chaganti, Jize Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 88 citations
