Navigating Extremes: Dynamic Sparsity in Large Output Spaces
Nasibullah Nasibullah, Erik Schultheis, Mike Lasby, Yani Ioannou, Rohit Babbar
Abstract
In recent years, Dynamic Sparse Training (DST) has emerged as an alternative to post-training pruning for generating efficient models. In principle, DST allows for a more memory efficient training process, as it maintains sparsity throughout the entire training run. However, current DST implementations fail to capitalize on this in practice. Because sparse matrix multiplication is much less efficient than dense matrix multiplication on GPUs, most implementations simulate sparsity by masking weights. In this paper, we leverage recent advances in semi-structured sparse training to apply DST in the domain of classification with large output spaces, where memory-efficiency is paramount. With a label space of possibly millions of candidates, the classification layer alone will consume several gigabytes of memory. Switching from a dense to a fixed fan-in sparse layer updated with sparse evolutionary training (SET); however, severely hampers training convergence, especially at the largest label spaces. We find that poor gradient flow from the sparse classifier to the dense text encoder make it difficult to learn good input representations. By employing an intermediate layer or adding an auxiliary training objective, we recover most of the generalisation performance of the dense model. Overall, we demonstrate the applicability and practical benefits of DST in a challenging domain -- characterized by a highly skewed label distribution that differs substantially from typical DST benchmark datasets -- which enables end-to-end training with millions of labels on commodity hardware.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 888bb607-5bd9-4dd1-9e3a-ff226ea069b1Cited by top-tier papers3
- Sparse CLIP: Co-Optimizing Interpretability and Performance in Contrastive LearningChuan Qin, Constantin Venhoff, Sonia Joseph, Fanyi Xiao et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- HASTE: Hardware-Aware Dynamic Sparse Training for Large Output SpacesNasib Ullah, Jinbin Zhang, Jean Lucien Randrianantenaina, Erik Schultheis et al.ICML 2026
- ELMO : Efficiency via Low-precision and Peak Memory Optimization in Large Output SpacesJinbin Zhang, Nasib Ullah, Erik Schultheis, Rohit BabbarICML 2025
Builds on28
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You NeedEran Malach, Gilad Yehudai, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Ohad ShamirICML 2020 · 327 citations
- Dynamic Model Pruning with FeedbackTao Lin, Sebastian U. Stich, Luis Barba, Daniil Dmitriev et al.ICLR 2020 · 229 citations
- Sparse GPU kernels for deep learningTrevor Gale, Matei Zaharia, Cliff Young, Erich ElsenSC 2020 · 170 citations
Related papers
- Memory-Efficient LLM Training with Dynamic Sparsity: From Stability to Practical ScalingQiao Xiao, Boqian Wu, Patrik Okanovic, Tomasz Sternal et al.ICML 2026
- Exposing and Exploiting Fine-Grained Block Structures for Fast and Accurate Sparse TrainingPeng Jiang, Lihan Hu, Shihui SongNeurIPS 2022 · 21 citations
- Advancing Dynamic Sparse Training by Exploring Optimization OpportunitiesJie Ji, Gen Li, Lu Yin, Minghai Qin et al.ICML 2024 · 10 citations
- SparseOpt: Addressing Normalization-induced Gradient Skew in Sparse TrainingAdnan Mohammed, Rohan Jain, Tom Jacobs, Ekansh Sharma et al.ICML 2026
- Pruning Large Language Models with Semi-Structural Adaptive Sparse TrainingWeiyu Huang, Yuezhou Hu, Guohao Jian, Jun Zhu et al.AAAI 2025 · 25 citations
