Privileged Information Distillation for Language Models
Emiliano Penaloza, Dheeraj Vattikonda, Nicolas Gontier, Alexandre Lacoste, Laurent Charlin, Massimo Caccia
Abstract
Training-time privileged information (PI) can enable language models to succeed on tasks they would otherwise fail, making it a powerful tool for Reinforcement Learning (RL) in hard, long-horizon settings. However, transferring capabilities learned with PI to policies that must act without it at inference time remains a fundamental challenge. We study this problem in the context of distilling frontier models for multi-turn agentic environments, which typically hide their internal reasoning and expose only action trajectories. This breaks standard distillation pipelines, since successful behavior is observable, but the reasoning process is not. For this, we introduce π-Distill, a joint teacher-student objective that trains a PI-conditioned teacher and an unconditioned student simultaneously using the same model. Additionally, we also introduce On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD), an alternative approach that trains using RL with a reverse KL-penalty between the student and the PI-conditioned teacher. We show that both of these algorithms effectively distill frontier agents using action-only PI. Specifically, we find that π-Distill and, in some cases, OPSD, outperform industry standard practices (Supervised finetuning followed by RL) that assume access to full Chain-of-Thought supervision across multiple agentic benchmarks, models, and forms of PI. We complement our results with extensive analysis that characterizes the factors enabling effective learning with PI, focusing primarily on π-Distill and characterizing when OPSD is competitive.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 882d643c-8f3c-4b0e-9c8d-92f1f56fc3bdCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 citations
- On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated MistakesRishabh Agarwal, Nino Vieillard, Yongchao Zhou, Piotr Stanczyk et al.ICLR 2024 · 311 citations
- Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language ModelsSiyan Zhao, Zhihui Xie, Mengchen Liu, Jing Huang et al.ICML 2026 · 245 citations
- Self-Distillation Enables Continual LearningIdan Shenfeld, Mehul Damani, Jonas Hübotter, Pulkit AgrawalICML 2026 · 159 citations
- Metacognitive Capabilities of LLMs: An Exploration in Mathematical Problem SolvingAniket Didolkar, Anirudh Goyal, Nan Rosemary Ke, Siyuan Guo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 101 citations
Related papers
- Reinforcement-aware Knowledge Distillation for LLM Reasoningzhaoyang zhang, Shuli Jiang, Yantao Shen, Yuting Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- Reinforcement Learning via Self-DistillationJonas Hübotter, Frederike Lübeck, Lejs Behric, Anton Baumann et al.ICML 2026
- Student-Centered Distillation Narrows the Agentic Gap Between Small and Large LLMsYuanjie Lyu, Chengyu Wang, Jun Huang, Tong XuICML 2026 · 9 citations
- Entropy-Aware On-Policy Distillation of Language ModelsWoogyeol Jin, Taywon Min, Yongjin Yang, Dennis Wei et al.ICML 2026 · 91 citations
- Video-OPD: Efficient Post-Training of Multimodal Large Language Models for Temporal Video Grounding via On-Policy DistillationJiaze Li, Hao Yin, Haoran Xu, Boshen Xu et al.ICML 2026 · 22 citations
