Software Vulnerability Management in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: An Industry Perspective
M. Mehdi Kholoosi, Triet Huynh Minh Le, M. Ali Babar
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized software development, particularly by automating repetitive tasks and improving developer productivity. While these advancements are well-documented, the use of AI-powered tools for Software Vulnerability Management (SVM), such as vulnerability detection and repair, remains underexplored in industry settings. To bridge this gap, our study aims to determine the extent of the adoption of AI-powered tools for SVM, identify barriers and facilitators to the use, and gather insights to help improve the tools to meet industry needs better. We conducted a survey study involving 60 practitioners from diverse industry sectors across 27 countries. The survey incorporates both quantitative and qualitative questions to analyze the adoption trends, assess tool strengths, identify practical challenges, and uncover opportunities for improvement. Our findings indicate that AI-powered tools are used throughout the SVM life cycle, with 69% of users reporting satisfaction with their current use. Practitioners value these tools for their speed, coverage, and accessibility. However, concerns about false positives, missing context, and trust issues remain prevalent. We observe a socio-technical adoption pattern in which AI outputs are filtered through human oversight and organizational governance. To support safe and effective use of AI for SVM, we recommend improvements in explainability, contextual awareness, integration workflows, and validation practices. We assert that these findings can offer practical guidance for practitioners, tool developers, and researchers seeking to enhance secure software development through the use of AI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 87fcc2e6-accf-42fe-8a3a-d1e77f7bf504Builds on15
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Data Quality for Software Vulnerability DatasetsRoland Croft, Muhammad Ali Babar, M. Mehdi KholoosiICSE 2023 · 138 citations
- A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and ChallengesJenny T. Liang, Chenyang Yang, Brad A. MyersICSE 2024 · 126 citations
- DeepCVA: Automated Commit-level Vulnerability Assessment with Deep Multi-task LearningTriet Huynh Minh Le, David Hin, Roland Croft, Muhammad Ali BabarASE 2021 · 62 citations
- Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability ManagementPeiyu Liu, Junming Liu, Lirong Fu, Kangjie Lu et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Closing the Gap: A User Study on the Real-world Usefulness of AI-powered Vulnerability Detection & Repair in the IDEBenjamin Steenhoek, Kalpathy Sivaraman, Renata Saldivar Gonzalez, Yevhen Mohylevskyy et al.ICSE 2025 · 3 citations
- Trust Enhancement Issues in Program RepairYannic Noller, Ridwan Shariffdeen, Xiang Gao, Abhik RoychoudhuryICSE 2022 · 51 citations
- Using AI Assistants in Software Development: A Qualitative Study on Security Practices and ConcernsJan H. Klemmer, Stefan Albert Horstmann, Nikhil Patnaik, Cordelia Ludden et al.CCS 2024 · 14 citations
- CyberGym-E2E: Scalable Real-World Benchmark for AI Agents' End-to-End Cybersecurity CapabilitiesTianneng Shi, Robin Rheem, Dongwei Jiang, Mona Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Exploring Experiences with Automated Program Repair in PracticeFairuz Nawer Meem, Justin Smith, Brittany JohnsonICSE 2024 · 14 citations
