Trust Enhancement Issues in Program Repair
Yannic Noller, Ridwan Shariffdeen, Xiang Gao, Abhik Roychoudhury
Abstract
Automated program repair is an emerging technology that seeks to automatically rectify bugs and vulnerabilities using learning, search, and semantic analysis. Trust in automatically generated patches is necessary for achieving greater adoption of program repair. Towards this goal, we survey more than 100 software practitioners to understand the artifacts and setups needed to enhance trust in automatically generated patches. Based on the feedback from the survey on developer preferences, we quantitatively evaluate existing test-suite based program repair tools. We find that they cannot produce high-quality patches within a top-10 ranking and an acceptable time period of 1 hour. The developer feedback from our qualitative study and the observations from our quantitative examination of existing repair tools point to actionable insights to drive program repair research. Specifically, we note that producing repairs within an acceptable time-bound is very much dependent on leveraging an abstract search space representation of a rich enough search space. Moreover, while additional developer inputs are valuable for generating or ranking patches, developers do not seem to be interested in a significant human-in-the-loop interaction.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 73b8f567-7a2f-4b2f-85d1-d1598771a054Cited by top-tier papers23
- Impact of Code Language Models on Automated Program RepairNan Jiang, Kevin Liu, Thibaud Lutellier, Lin TanICSE 2023 · 164 citations
- Large Language Models are Few-shot Testers: Exploring LLM-based General Bug ReproductionSungmin Kang, Juyeon Yoon, Shin YooICSE 2023 · 163 citations
- AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program ImprovementYuntong Zhang, Haifeng Ruan, Zhiyu Fan, Abhik RoychoudhuryISSTA 2024 · 96 citations
- How Effective Are Neural Networks for Fixing Security VulnerabilitiesYi Wu, Nan Jiang, Hung Viet Pham, Thibaud Lutellier et al.ISSTA 2023 · 86 citations
- SelfAPR: Self-supervised Program Repair with Test Execution DiagnosticsHe Ye, Matias Martinez, Xiapu Luo, Tao Zhang et al.ASE 2022 · 75 citations
Builds on4
- On the efficiency of test suite based program repair: A Systematic Assessment of 16 Automated Repair Systems for Java ProgramsKui Liu, Shangwen Wang, Anil Koyuncu, Kisub Kim et al.ICSE 2020 · 116 citations
- VarFix: balancing edit expressiveness and search effectiveness in automated program repairChu-Pan Wong, Priscila Santiesteban, Christian Kästner, Claire Le GouesFSE 2021 · 47 citations
- Concolic program repairRidwan Salihin Shariffdeen, Yannic Noller, Lars Grunske, Abhik RoychoudhuryPLDI 2021 · 45 citations
- Fast and Precise On-the-fly Patch Validation for AllLingchao Chen, Yicheng Ouyang, Lingming ZhangICSE 2021 · 24 citations
Related papers
- Exploring Experiences with Automated Program Repair in PracticeFairuz Nawer Meem, Justin Smith, Brittany JohnsonICSE 2024 · 14 citations
- Practical Program Repair via Preference-based Ensemble StrategyWenkang Zhong, Chuanyi Li, Kui Liu, Tongtong Xu et al.ICSE 2024 · 8 citations
- Automated Patch Correctness Assessment: How Far are We?Shangwen Wang, Ming Wen, Bo Lin, Hongjun Wu et al.ASE 2020 · 77 citations
- Using Safety Properties to Generate Vulnerability PatchesZhen Huang, David Lie, Gang Tan, Trent JaegerS&P 2019 · 91 citations
- A Bayesian Framework for Automated DebuggingSungmin Kang, Wonkeun Choi, Shin YooISSTA 2023 · 1 citation
