Reflection-Bench: Evaluating Epistemic Agency in Large Language Models
Lingyu Li, Yixu Wang, Haiquan Zhao, Shuqi Kong, Yan Teng, Chunbo Li, Yingchun Wang
Abstract
With large language models (LLMs) increasingly deployed as cognitive engines for AI agents, the reliability and effectiveness critically hinge on their intrinsic epistemic agency, which remains understudied. Epistemic agency, the ability to flexibly construct, adapt, and monitor beliefs about dynamic environments, represents a base-model-level capacity independent of specific tools, modules, or applications. We characterize the holistic process underlying epistemic agency, which unfolds in seven interrelated dimensions: prediction, decision-making, perception, memory, counterfactual thinking, belief updating, and meta-reflection. Correspondingly, we propose Reflection-Bench, a cognitive-psychologyinspired benchmark consisting of seven tasks with long-term relevance and minimization of data leakage. Through a comprehensive evaluation of 16 models using three prompting strategies, we identify a clear three-tier performance hierarchy and significant limitations of current LLMs, particularly in meta-reflection capabilities. While state-of-the-art LLMs demonstrate rudimentary signs of epistemic agency, our findings suggest several promising research directions, including enhancing core cognitive functions, improving cross-functional coordination, and developing adaptive processing mechanisms. Our code and data are available at https://github. com/AI45Lab/ReflectionBench .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8781ea55-01bc-4af5-92e7-331fb4a7ae11Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as AgentsXiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 748 citations
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 479 citations
- Can large language models explore in-context?Akshay Krishnamurthy, Keegan Harris, Dylan J. Foster, Cyril Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 95 citations
Related papers
- AwarenessBench: Assessing Cognitive Capabilities of Language ModelsXiaojian Li, Rongwu Xu, Tianyun Zhang, Yue Wang et al.ACL 2026
- CogBench: a large language model walks into a psychology labJulian Coda-Forno, Marcel Binz, Jane X. Wang, Eric SchulzICML 2024 · 60 citations
- SMART: Evaluating LLMs' Mathematical Reasoning via a Human Cognitive Process-Inspired BenchmarkYujie Hou, Mei Wang, Yaoyao Zhong, Ting Zhang et al.ACL 2026
- ReflecTool: Towards Reflection-Aware Tool-Augmented Clinical AgentsYusheng Liao, Shuyang Jiang, Yanfeng Wang, Yu WangACL 2025 · 14 citations
- USTBench: Benchmarking and Dissecting Spatiotemporal Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs as Urban AgentsSiqi Lai, Yansong Ning, Zirui Yuan, Zhixi Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
