The Other Mind: How Language Models Exhibit Human Temporal Cognition
Lingyu Li, Yang Yao, Yixu Wang, Chunbo Li, Yan Teng, Yingchun Wang
Abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance, they exhibit certain cognitive patterns similar to those of humans that are not directly specified in training data. This study investigates this phenomenon by focusing on temporal cognition in LLMs. Leveraging the similarity judgment task, we find that larger models spontaneously establish a subjective temporal reference point and adhere to the Weber-Fechner law, whereby the perceived distance logarithmically compresses as years recede from this reference point. To uncover the mechanisms behind this behavior, we conducted multiple analyses across neuronal, representational, and informational levels. We first identify a set of temporal-preferential neurons and find that this group exhibits minimal activation at the subjective reference point and implements a logarithmic coding scheme convergently found in biological systems. Probing representations of years reveals a hierarchical construction process, where years evolve from basic numerical values in shallow layers to abstract temporal orientation in deep layers. Finally, using pre-trained embedding models, we found that the training corpus itself possesses an inherent, non-linear temporal structure, which provides the raw material for the model's internal construction. In discussion, we propose an experientialist perspective for understanding these findings, where the LLMs' cognition is viewed as a subjective construction of the external world by its internal representational system. This nuanced perspective implies the potential emergence of alien cognitive frameworks that humans cannot intuitively predict, pointing toward a direction for AI alignment that focuses on guiding internal constructions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on8
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem ComplexityParshin Shojaee, Iman Mirzadeh, Keivan Alizadeh-Vahid, Maxwell Horton et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 507 citations
- Can Large Language Models Understand Real-World Complex Instructions?Qianyu He, Jie Zeng, Wenhao Huang, Lina Chen et al.AAAI 2024 · 99 citations
- From Tokens to Thoughts: How LLMs and Humans Trade Compression for MeaningChen Shani, Liron Soffer, Dan Jurafsky, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2026 · 38 citations
- Mind Your Step (by Step): Chain-of-Thought can Reduce Performance on Tasks where Thinking Makes Humans WorseRyan Liu, Jiayi Geng, Addison J. Wu, Ilia Sucholutsky et al.ICML 2025 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Do Large Language Models Think like the Brain? Sentence-Level Evidences from Layer-Wise Embeddings and fMRIYu Lei, Xingyang Ge, Yi Zhang, Yiming Yang et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Scaling and context steer LLMs along the same computational path as the human brainJoséphine Raugel, Jérémy Rapin, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Valentin Wyart et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- How LLMs Comprehend Temporal Meaning in Narratives: A Case Study in Cognitive Evaluation of LLMsKarin de Langis, Jong Inn Park, Andreas Schramm, Bin Hu et al.ACL 2025
- Development of Cognitive Intelligence in Pre-trained Language ModelsRaj Sanjay Shah, Khushi Bhardwaj, Sashank VarmaEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Temporal Context Reinstatement Drives Episodic-Like Order Memory in Long-Context Language ModelsMathis Pink, Vy Vo, Qinyuan Wu, Jianing Mu et al.ICML 2026
