From Evidence to Trajectory: Abductive Reasoning Path Synthesis for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Agents Development
Muzhi Li, Jinhu Qi, Yihong Wu, Minghao Zhao, Liheng Ma, Yifan Li, Xinyu Wang, Zhenghan Tai, Zixing Song, Yingxue Zhang, Ho-fung Leung, Irwin King
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) agent development is hindered by the lack of executable ground-truth agent-environment interaction trajectories. Existing datasets provide questions, answers, and evidence, but lack fine-grained supervision for retriever invocation, dynamic planning, and stepwise decision-making. Reinforcement learning offers a potential solution, but often suffers from sparse rewards and cold-start failures when base large language models (LLMs) lack sufficient reasoning capability. Meanwhile, existing data synthesis methods mainly generate post-hoc rationales rather than executable environment-interaction trajectories. In this paper, we propose EviPath, an evidence-anchored reasoning path synthesis paradigm for RAG agent development. EviPath reverse-engineers executable trajectories from question-answer pairs and supporting evidence through three stages: (i) Abductive Subtask Planning, which decomposes questions and plans dependency-aware solution paths; (ii) Faithful Sub-question Answering, which uses supporting evidence as a proxy environment to generate grounded intermediate thoughts and answers; and (iii) Conversational Fine-Tuning, which converts complete trajectories into a dialogue-format for supervised fine-tuning. Experiments on widely used question-answering benchmarks show that an 8B model trained on our synthetic corpus significantly and consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a 14.7% absolute Exact Match gain in open-domain question answering.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 87611abe-3282-4d2a-abd8-e674cb65032aBuilds on19
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
- HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for Large Language ModelsBernal Jimenez Gutierrez, Yiheng Shu, Yu Gu, Michihiro Yasunaga et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 395 citations
- LongLoRA: Efficient Fine-tuning of Long-Context Large Language ModelsYukang Chen, Shengju Qian, Haotian Tang, Xin Lai et al.ICLR 2024 · 254 citations
Related papers
- EvoGraph-R1: Self-Evolving Multimodal Knowledge Hypergraphs for Agentic RetrievalJiashi Lin, Changhong Jiang, Xiangru Lin, Ruifei Zhang et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- REAP: Enhancing RAG with Recursive Evaluation and Adaptive Planning for Multi-Hop Question AnsweringYijie Zhu, Haojie Zhou, Wanting Hong, Tailin Liu et al.AAAI 2026
- Process vs. Outcome Reward: Which is Better for Agentic RAG Reinforcement LearningWenlin Zhang, Xiangyang Li, Kuicai Dong, Yichao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 85 citations
- CP-Search: A Chain Progressive Search Training Framework Incentivizing the Cognitive Behaviors for Searching in LLMsZehua Wang, Shipeng Li, Buzhou TangAAAI 2026
- MC-Search: Evaluating and Enhancing Multimodal Agentic Search with Structured Long Reasoning ChainsXuying Ning, Dongqi Fu, Tianxin Wei, Mengting Ai et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
