Can Autonomous Vehicles Identify, Recover From, and Adapt to Distribution Shifts?
Angelos Filos, Panagiotis Tigas, Rowan McAllister, Nicholas Rhinehart, Sergey Levine, Yarin Gal
Abstract
Out-of-training-distribution (OOD) scenarios are a common challenge of learning agents at deployment, typically leading to arbitrary deductions and poorly-informed decisions. In principle, detection of and adaptation to OOD scenes can mitigate their adverse effects. In this paper, we highlight the limitations of current approaches to novel driving scenes and propose an epistemic uncertainty-aware planning method, called robust imitative planning (RIP). Our method can detect and recover from some distribution shifts, reducing the overconfident and catastrophic extrapolations in OOD scenes. If the model's uncertainty is too great to suggest a safe course of action, the model can instead query the expert driver for feedback, enabling sample-efficient online adaptation, a variant of our method we term adaptive robust imitative planning (AdaRIP). Our methods outperform current state-of-the-art approaches in the nuScenes prediction challenge, but since no benchmark evaluating OOD detection and adaption currently exists to assess control, we introduce an autonomous car novel-scene benchmark, CARNOVEL, to evaluate the robustness of driving agents to a suite of tasks with distribution shifts, where our methods outperform all the baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 86fe1be0-686c-4217-bd1c-1ed369339ea3Cited by top-tier papers35
- ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified ActivationsYiyou Sun, Chuan Guo, Yixuan LiNeurIPS 2021 · 733 citations
- NEAT: Neural Attention Fields for End-to-End Autonomous DrivingKashyap Chitta, Aditya Prakash, Andreas GeigerICCV 2021 · 274 citations
- GameFormer: Game-theoretic Modeling and Learning of Transformer-based Interactive Prediction and Planning for Autonomous DrivingZhiyu Huang, Haochen Liu, Chen LvICCV 2023 · 209 citations
- Causal Navigation by Continuous-time Neural NetworksCharles Vorbach, Ramin M. Hasani, Alexander Amini, Mathias Lechner et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 64 citations
- The Auto Arborist Dataset: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Multiview Urban Forest Monitoring Under Domain ShiftSara Beery, Guanhang Wu, Trevor Edwards, Filip Pavetic et al.CVPR 2022 · 53 citations
Builds on4
- Exploring the Limitations of Behavior Cloning for Autonomous DrivingFelipe Codevilla, Eder Santana, Antonio M. López, Adrien GaidonICCV 2019 · 666 citations
- PRECOG: PREdiction Conditioned on Goals in Visual Multi-Agent SettingsNicholas Rhinehart, Rowan McAllister, Kris Kitani, Sergey LevineICCV 2019 · 407 citations
- Deep Imitative Models for Flexible Inference, Planning, and ControlNicholas Rhinehart, Rowan McAllister, Sergey LevineICLR 2020 · 159 citations
- nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous DrivingHolger Caesar, Varun Bankiti, Alex H. Lang, Sourabh Vora et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- Vehicle trajectory prediction works, but not everywhereMohammadhossein Bahari, Saeed Saadatnejad, Ahmad Rahimi, Mohammad Shahverdikondori et al.CVPR 2022 · 65 citations
- SimScale: Learning to Drive via Real-World Simulation at ScaleHaochen Tian, Tianyu Li, Haochen Liu, Jiazhi Yang et al.CVPR 2026 · 40 citations
- CaDeT: A Causal Disentanglement Approach for Robust Trajectory Prediction in Autonomous DrivingMozhgan Pourkeshavarz, Junrui Zhang, Amir RasouliCVPR 2024 · 15 citations
- Reasoning Multi-Agent Behavioral Topology for Interactive Autonomous DrivingHaochen Liu, Li Chen, Yu Qiao, Chen Lv et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 52 citations
- The Blind Spot of Adaptation: Quantifying and Mitigating Forgetting in Fine-tuned Driving ModelsRunhao Mao, Hanshi Wang, Yixiang Yang, Qianli Ma et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
